On the subject of children, fairness and 'understanding': I've noticed quite often these days that (at least on 1 particular platform) anyone suggesting that fairness is a good thing (or even decency come to that) is open to accusations of 'being childish'.
Almost as if some sorts have successfully convinced themselves that not only do 'grown ups' know best but also that being bad is officially good.
Those so-called grown-ups are clearly bad grown-ups. And they are the ones who are responsible for making life unfair. Maybe they had an unfair upbringing (not that this should be constituted as an excuse, mind - more of an explanation).
But life should be fair, and all children instinctively know this. Under normal circumstances, with normal, emotionally mature grown-ups, it would be fair.
This is an important point about the cabal, imo - part of their strategy is to make life unfair especially for children - inflicting trauma on people is an effective way of preventing maturity and fairness.
The "Disfunctional Nurture" thing came from Tim Fletcher, who is an addiction/complex truma councillor, I'm not sure he actually used the term but he does use disfunctional family dymnmaics/upbringing/relationships wordage. He has a lot of very useful presentations on youtube describing, in depth, how disfunctional relationships cause trauma and it's various effects, but annoyingly all the in depth self help/recovery strategies seem to stop at cruital points, after investing hours getting there, you hit a paywall to one of his courses.
For anyone interested in truma recovery, the only really useful strategies I've found for healing from complex trauma come from Pete Walkers book "Complext PTSD from surviving to thriving". You can download a free copy from the anti-copyright resorce https://annas-archive.org/ I'm very familiar witht he book, I've bought 6 copies over the year to gift to friends, I've found the best way to make use of it is to read it like a reference book, cover to cover, then reread with a highlighter pen to highlight anything that resonates with you, each time you reread use a different colour highlighter, you will gain further insight each time. If you're reading an electonic copy, download a free highlighter program and use that.
I think I can see where you're going with disfunctional nurture turned into an idealology Evelyn, perhaps a certain supremacist idealogy/religion teaching they're "chosen ones" with a predilection for pathalogical in group preference, teaching all outsiders being sub-human animals, with lying and cheating outsiders being normalised to the point of duty.
Re War: Is it not an extension, or extreme corruption if you like, of the inate instinct to resource/territory hording? We see this behaviour in children, wolves, hampsters, ants etc. The Cabal (or Kabal) take it to extremes, and get others to do it for them, in the form of warfare or course.
Thanks for that tip for the downloadable book - I shall endeavour to check it out.
Glad you can see where I'm going with the ideology - for various reasons I'm going to keep it generalised and allow the reader to join the dots. And then deny it if anyone accuses me of certain anti-stuff lol. The important thing is of course to understand it psychologically, meaning I can be generalised about it. I'm consciously avoiding the obvious, in other words (!).
I can see what you're getting at with territorialism, although I would say it's more nuanced in nature. Although it is certainly what we could call 'extremism' in the sense of taking a basic drive/motivation and making an extreme pathology about it, and ideology to justify it. The ideology, I would say, is the indoctrination and mind control (with a baseline trauma to catalyse it), part of the purpose of which is to circumvent the conscience - that's to say the conscience with regards to 'the other' ('any crime against the other is not a crime' etc.). So the ideology is there to justify the extremism, but also to reinforce and maintain it. It certainly requires a serious psychological/psychohistorical analysis - because reaching to that stage really is an aberration - we simply don't see that kind of ideology occurring naturally in any other human social group. And any ideologies which resemble it have developed afterwards, not before or independently.
What we see in nature is that this kind of 'extremism' could only ever happen in times of very, very serious crisis and resource scarcity. There's also the social cognition number (population size) aspect. If we take, for example, a pack of wolves with a definite population size and a territory to match (such that they are in an ecological balance between size and resources within a certain area), then if they expanded that territory then, by simple mathematics, they are spreading out their 'forces' and quite quickly reach a practical limit. As for hording, similar considerations apply. Food after all tends to go off pretty quickly, so there is no point in hording more than you can eat, so to speak. In fact it's dangerous to do that precisely because it becomes rotten. Stuff that can be preserved (like nuts I suppose) then sure - but even then you eventually reach an ecological balance.
I'm not sure human children horde - at least not in the same way. They may horde pretty things, but not things they need. And they soon grow out of it. I would say it's something to do with the stage of brain development. Although hording can be the result of trauma of course. That's definitely something to be examined though.
I would also say that war, under 'normal' circumstances, is a reaction to a threat (such as a territorial incursion). So it's self-defence. But that self-defence mechanism can be and is exploited. Hence propaganda always says 'that other group over there is a threat to you so you have to activate your self-defence programming'. They don't say 'we would like you, people, to join us in our imperialist crusade of territorial expansion and resource theft etc.', because they know normal people would object. So they have to lie (because 'normal people are good'). Thus the wars of offence, rather than defence, are only initiated or prosecuted by the cabal - i.e. the aberrations. Just that they have developed very effective propaganda to get others to support it.
Having said that, after so many centuries of (ideological) indoctrination they have created an ever increasing percentage of the population who would, actually, happily join them in a war of conquest and domination (although you'd probably have to bribe them with promises of riches and rape and such like). So perhaps we could see this propaganda as genuinely stretching back several thousand years and insidiously infecting and changing more and more people's attitudes, thus increasing the percentage of 'aberrations'. That would be the really sinister endgame, as I hinted at - even the odds by turning eventually the entire human species into monsters, by creating a sick world, to which the brain adapts by becoming sick - thus manipulating evolution to create a species of monsters. That would, ironically, be the most long-term solution for them. Scary thought...
These articles are top notch, and have a great value for me.
Here's my 2 cents in short. While I like the way you expand on psychological profile of the cabal, for any real resistance that may one day arise and begin removing the cabal from the top societal positions, it's absolute and undoubted necessity to know who they are. If we want to eliminate them from our society, we have to learn about their names. Or even better, we need to know where they live or hide. Why? Because otherwise we're clueless who we're talking about here. Calling them cabal can't answer these two particular questions nor steer such revolution in the right direction. In short, naming the names is the name of the game - without knowing whom we're supposed to address as cabal in particular, potential revolution has a serious shortcoming.
Also, the dark triad, though interesting subject per se, is rather irrelevant for the analysis in my opinion, since cabal's brains are inherently wired in a different way, so these human concepts don't apply to them in the same way as they do to human species. I think it's a rather obvious to note that they're radically different from commoners as you've already expanded on before. I suspect you'd have discovered some new psychological concepts if allowed to study them in person and get to experience the way they think and feel from up close.
With regards to your first cent - I agree, but I would leave that for a separate essay (or, well, series of papers, shall we say!). In these articles I wanted to specifically focus on the psychology rather than digress into identifications. Mind you, what I'm kind of doing here is creating a 'profile', which can then be used in practice to identify and expose named individuals. But I did want to keep that aspect separate, so it's not really an omission on my part. Likewise, let's say the resistance did eventually win (or at least suppress the cabal so they go into hiding again for several hundred years), then this kind of psych profile can be of immense practical use in detecting and neutralising potential monsters before they get into positions of money, power and influence again. It can be taught in schools, for example, to provide people with a greater immunity.
With regards to your second cent, I also agree that their brains are wired differently and you have anticipated where I'm going with part 3! So hold your griffins on that one. Yes, it is obvious, of course, so what I intend to do is discuss the evolutionary and anthropological ramifications and insights of this (it's important to consider how they arose and where they come from etc.). At the same time, by highlighting these differences I'm also helping normal humans to understand themselves by contrast, namely the inherent goodness in a normal human (absent some traumatic/dysfunctional nurture).
Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on which way you look at it, I have in fact been able to study them in person from up close - this happened during my childhood, and it has given me a lot of psychological insight. Much of that insight and experience does of course not only inform my worldview but it's also informing these articles. As I'll get into later, one of the (me as an adult) triggers to all this was finding out a lot more about the child abuse network. It reminded me (i.e. broke through some of my amnesia walls) that the kind of creatures who carry out that sort of horrific abuse can't possibly be human - their brains must, indeed, be wired differently. Having learned a fair bit about neuroscience in later life as an adult I've been able to gain a far greater, and, I don't know, less emotional perhaps, understanding of these monsters.
If I was to give you a link to the article which produced the most significant trigger then it's the IGSP-Studies Beyond Dutroux article about the Belgian X-dossiers. If you haven't read it here's the link: https://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair
That article, if you haven't read it, should come with a serious warning attached because it's beyond disturbing. What you will be interested in though is the later parts of the article in which he does, indeed, name names and expose their ties with all those cabal-oriented NGOs (le Cercle etc.). It's quite a long article though so it'll take you a few goes to get through it (mercifully, to be honest - it's far too much to take in all at one sitting). It also says a fair bit about dissociation and MPD.
The other one to read would of course be Dave McGowan's Programmed to Kill (which forms a nice companion piece to that article).
Anyhow - I'm hoping to have part 3 ready for this weekend. But I am very, very happy you're getting a lot out of this so far! Thanks!
Ouch, Dutroux... I read that one and couldn't agree more with you - that's the darkest and most disturbing content out there by far. If true even in part, it should serve as a warning to all those people in denial about the extent of cruelty some individuals are capable of doing. Thinking about the story from my memory, I was shocked how far up the corruption went and how forcefully those involved were trying to hide all possible revelations when it started to surface in the mainstream media. It's quite worrying since I'm currently residing in Belgium as my job brought me to this country, and quite frankly, there's some dark energy present here which I can't properly describe. Maybe I'm overacting, but I can hardly wait for my project to end so I can return to my beloved home.
Anyway, sorry for going ahead of time and subject.
I have been thinking of doing an autobiographical horror story about all that stuff. It’s coming back to me lately, especially as I get mentally stronger.
Most people wouldn’t believe it though. That’s how they get away with it.
Or it’s so disturbing they just switch off.
I was 7 years old by the way, when the first child game hunt happened. I don’t remember anything else after that. Obviously I woke up later but that was a different me.
If your hypothesis that a separate human strain exists, were accepted worldwide, even without the backing of neuroscientific investigations, it would be a life saver for humanity. It would be so much easier to explain the human history of horror, as well as to prevent it from happening again and again, if people got a firm grip on the existence of such a humanoid species. However, what is necessary is an identifier of the Homo Immanis entities for Homo Sapiens to get a grip on it. Just as you can recognize a person with Down's syndrome, it would be helpful to detect the Homo Immanis on similar phenotypical traits that apply to them.
Unfortunately, there are no visual giveaways. That's not to say that they cannot resemble Homo Sapiens type humanoids despite their terribly defunct wiring. It just makes it harder to detect them, without having direct contact with them. Of course, anyone who promotes or participates in genocide, pedofilism, torture or murder for whatever reason, is by definition a Homo Immanis, and needs to be removed from society immediately. Without these aberrations, there would be no horror in the world. Or is it possible for Homo Sapiens to be a murderer without a conscience too? In that case, Homo Immanis and Homo Sapiens are one and the same, and there simply exists a broad spectrum of malevolent disorders in humanity as a whole, which may be stimulated by personal desires and circumstance. But I do not think that this is the case.
However, without the ability of visual inspection and determination, Homo Sapiens resorts to explanations of 'Fallen angels' and 'satanists' and 'Elite' and 'Illuminati' and etc, and 'demons' that possess human beings. When in fact one can contribute the destructive behavior of Homo Immanis to purely physiological and neurological defects. What is obvious about Homo Immanis, is that they lack creativity, and must heavily rely on a subset of Homo Sapiens to do their bidding. Greed and ambition are generally motivating factors here.
Therefore, along with your hypothesis, I recognize a difference between psychopaths as a subset of Homo Sapiens, and the fullfledged completey different strain of Homo Immanis. It explains the horror in the world, and why Homo Immanis was able to survive all these years - parasitically relying on the Homo Sapiens subset of psychopathic mental cases, thereby controlling the individual and group psychology.
Yes, I think it is right to distinguish between Immanis and psychopaths. There are clear differences. I think one is that psychopaths, although capable of cooperation, are essentially selfish and individualists. Immanis, however, has a very strong (perhaps overwhelming) sense of group identity, to which it may even be subordinate. The survival of the group being more important than the survival of the individual (hence why they favour cults).
Of course they are very happy to make humans pass them off as just psychopaths (or sociopaths, even). So yes, I do think some Sapiens can be socio- or psychopaths - whether they are born that way or made is another question of course. But I do think Immanis has indeed been studying ways to turn more Sapiens into socio- and psychopaths (chronic psychological stress from an early age and into adulthood is one method that springs to mind). I do, in fact, largely think of the MK-Ultra experiments as specifically having these intentions. And of course they would think nothing of experimenting on humans.
And absolutely a general understanding or acceptance of all this would be a life-saver for humanity. That is essentially the underlying purpose of this series, the intention that I had. And the thing is technology/science has gotten to the stage where it would be possible to prove the hypothesis. Although even without proof, I think simply widespread (or even just academic) consideration of the hypothesis would make a real difference. As I say, it makes the whole thing - I mean history, the way the world operates - a lot easier and more palatable for people to understand. The demystifying of evil, I mean.
p.s. as an afterthought... If, as you postulate, Homo Immanis is a small group, then why are there so many killers and predators in this world? History is replete with it: killers, torturers, genocidal maniacs, murderers, pedophiles and sadists. There are many, many many more than just a small group! If the small group of Homo Immanis is the instigator, then where do these throngs of murderous madmen hail from... godforbid from Homo Sapiens? No. In fact, Homo Immanis must be a much larger group than we think. Much larger... with many dormant murderers yet to be awakened. And that means that the group Homo Sapiens is rather small. What is your thought on my afterthought?
Actually it's interesting and pertinent that you bring up that very question, as regards to the population size. I was thinking of looking into that question in a potential part five. Vexman (you may have noticed some of his comments) asked the very same question.
As you say, if you look at the numbers - especially genocidal maniacs (e.g. Bolsheviks/Trotsky's red terror) you are talking a very large number. I was in part thinking in terms of 'as a percentage of the total human population'. So, given there are around 8 billion humans, even if we denote only 1% as Immanis then that's still 80 million. Or even 0.1% is 8 million. I suspect the truth may lie somewhere in between those two. So not only is that a sizeable number, but it's enough to achieve global domination, at least by occupying all the high places.
Of course they'd need 'foot soldiers' and minions - which I guess is where the MK experiments come in. Their question being 'can we do MK on a massive population level' (as opposed to just individuals). I think the answer is yes, because if you atomise society and destroy community spirit, then inflict stress on people, humans tend to go into self-defence mode, which is a kind of self-centred mode, simply for survival purposes - in which case they act like individuals. When you have individualised (isolated) them, then the same MK methods can be deployed. The social group then mutually reinforces the methods/programming (group think).
Likewise they can take advantage of humans relatively low social cognition number (Dunbar's number), namely 150.
Again - these are all vital areas to be studied. And I have noted well that if you look at all the 'agents' or 'cognitive infiltrators' in the so-called conspiracy theory subculture, these are the very topics they avoid talking about, and the topics they attempt to divert attention from. That, to me, is very telling.
What concerns me, is that I see this Immanis behavior among 'normal' Homo Sapiens. I can count a few: one, just back from the Gulf war, happily confided in me "i like to kill people" / another, a neighbor, said he was surprised I had no desire to kill people, because he did / another, a friend at the uni, said he hoped to find a corpse during our walks in the mountains / another recounted that he had killed at least 260 'gooks' while in Vietnam. There seems to be a penchant or a desire for killing in seemingly 'normal' Homo Sapiens people; people that have not been subjected to MKultra or other sinister training. Unless it's just big talk, except for the Gulf war guy, who truly spoke the truth to me, and the Vietnam vet. He asked to keep it to myself. He just wanted to confirm something I had written about; a model about behavior and killing. Maybe from the four examples, he was a true H. Immanis. Notice also that the desire to kill possesses mostly men. That too, is avoided as a topic.
Yeah - that is a worrying trend. Perhaps it can partly be explained by the war against the spirit, involving, amongst other things, the inflicting of over a thousand years of the monotheistic ideology on people. Essentially a form of long-term conditioning.
That suggests a very thought out long-term strategy…
p.s. i'm adding the word "male" to the monotheistic ideology. Lastly, the purpose of the vax ties into your hypothesis of the H. Immanis. (nothing to do with virus or covid, that's all ruses.)
Yes, although rather than necessarily 'male' it would certainly be 'patriarchal' or 'patriarchy' or similar. It's done immeasurable damage to humanity, and the world. Well, and me when I was a child too, for that matter.
Right.... and it continues to do so, this 'male prerogative.' I can point to an immense bulwark of male collaboration, perversion and abuse, and tremendous amounts of money and wealth, running the world. As for your personal experiences, share it only with your inner circle of trust, not on this open forum, for your own good and well being... I embrace you across the distance.
On the subject of children, fairness and 'understanding': I've noticed quite often these days that (at least on 1 particular platform) anyone suggesting that fairness is a good thing (or even decency come to that) is open to accusations of 'being childish'.
Almost as if some sorts have successfully convinced themselves that not only do 'grown ups' know best but also that being bad is officially good.
I'd love to know where they get these ideas from.
Those so-called grown-ups are clearly bad grown-ups. And they are the ones who are responsible for making life unfair. Maybe they had an unfair upbringing (not that this should be constituted as an excuse, mind - more of an explanation).
But life should be fair, and all children instinctively know this. Under normal circumstances, with normal, emotionally mature grown-ups, it would be fair.
This is an important point about the cabal, imo - part of their strategy is to make life unfair especially for children - inflicting trauma on people is an effective way of preventing maturity and fairness.
Sturmerites
The "Disfunctional Nurture" thing came from Tim Fletcher, who is an addiction/complex truma councillor, I'm not sure he actually used the term but he does use disfunctional family dymnmaics/upbringing/relationships wordage. He has a lot of very useful presentations on youtube describing, in depth, how disfunctional relationships cause trauma and it's various effects, but annoyingly all the in depth self help/recovery strategies seem to stop at cruital points, after investing hours getting there, you hit a paywall to one of his courses.
For anyone interested in truma recovery, the only really useful strategies I've found for healing from complex trauma come from Pete Walkers book "Complext PTSD from surviving to thriving". You can download a free copy from the anti-copyright resorce https://annas-archive.org/ I'm very familiar witht he book, I've bought 6 copies over the year to gift to friends, I've found the best way to make use of it is to read it like a reference book, cover to cover, then reread with a highlighter pen to highlight anything that resonates with you, each time you reread use a different colour highlighter, you will gain further insight each time. If you're reading an electonic copy, download a free highlighter program and use that.
I think I can see where you're going with disfunctional nurture turned into an idealology Evelyn, perhaps a certain supremacist idealogy/religion teaching they're "chosen ones" with a predilection for pathalogical in group preference, teaching all outsiders being sub-human animals, with lying and cheating outsiders being normalised to the point of duty.
Re War: Is it not an extension, or extreme corruption if you like, of the inate instinct to resource/territory hording? We see this behaviour in children, wolves, hampsters, ants etc. The Cabal (or Kabal) take it to extremes, and get others to do it for them, in the form of warfare or course.
Thanks for that tip for the downloadable book - I shall endeavour to check it out.
Glad you can see where I'm going with the ideology - for various reasons I'm going to keep it generalised and allow the reader to join the dots. And then deny it if anyone accuses me of certain anti-stuff lol. The important thing is of course to understand it psychologically, meaning I can be generalised about it. I'm consciously avoiding the obvious, in other words (!).
I can see what you're getting at with territorialism, although I would say it's more nuanced in nature. Although it is certainly what we could call 'extremism' in the sense of taking a basic drive/motivation and making an extreme pathology about it, and ideology to justify it. The ideology, I would say, is the indoctrination and mind control (with a baseline trauma to catalyse it), part of the purpose of which is to circumvent the conscience - that's to say the conscience with regards to 'the other' ('any crime against the other is not a crime' etc.). So the ideology is there to justify the extremism, but also to reinforce and maintain it. It certainly requires a serious psychological/psychohistorical analysis - because reaching to that stage really is an aberration - we simply don't see that kind of ideology occurring naturally in any other human social group. And any ideologies which resemble it have developed afterwards, not before or independently.
What we see in nature is that this kind of 'extremism' could only ever happen in times of very, very serious crisis and resource scarcity. There's also the social cognition number (population size) aspect. If we take, for example, a pack of wolves with a definite population size and a territory to match (such that they are in an ecological balance between size and resources within a certain area), then if they expanded that territory then, by simple mathematics, they are spreading out their 'forces' and quite quickly reach a practical limit. As for hording, similar considerations apply. Food after all tends to go off pretty quickly, so there is no point in hording more than you can eat, so to speak. In fact it's dangerous to do that precisely because it becomes rotten. Stuff that can be preserved (like nuts I suppose) then sure - but even then you eventually reach an ecological balance.
I'm not sure human children horde - at least not in the same way. They may horde pretty things, but not things they need. And they soon grow out of it. I would say it's something to do with the stage of brain development. Although hording can be the result of trauma of course. That's definitely something to be examined though.
I would also say that war, under 'normal' circumstances, is a reaction to a threat (such as a territorial incursion). So it's self-defence. But that self-defence mechanism can be and is exploited. Hence propaganda always says 'that other group over there is a threat to you so you have to activate your self-defence programming'. They don't say 'we would like you, people, to join us in our imperialist crusade of territorial expansion and resource theft etc.', because they know normal people would object. So they have to lie (because 'normal people are good'). Thus the wars of offence, rather than defence, are only initiated or prosecuted by the cabal - i.e. the aberrations. Just that they have developed very effective propaganda to get others to support it.
Having said that, after so many centuries of (ideological) indoctrination they have created an ever increasing percentage of the population who would, actually, happily join them in a war of conquest and domination (although you'd probably have to bribe them with promises of riches and rape and such like). So perhaps we could see this propaganda as genuinely stretching back several thousand years and insidiously infecting and changing more and more people's attitudes, thus increasing the percentage of 'aberrations'. That would be the really sinister endgame, as I hinted at - even the odds by turning eventually the entire human species into monsters, by creating a sick world, to which the brain adapts by becoming sick - thus manipulating evolution to create a species of monsters. That would, ironically, be the most long-term solution for them. Scary thought...
These articles are top notch, and have a great value for me.
Here's my 2 cents in short. While I like the way you expand on psychological profile of the cabal, for any real resistance that may one day arise and begin removing the cabal from the top societal positions, it's absolute and undoubted necessity to know who they are. If we want to eliminate them from our society, we have to learn about their names. Or even better, we need to know where they live or hide. Why? Because otherwise we're clueless who we're talking about here. Calling them cabal can't answer these two particular questions nor steer such revolution in the right direction. In short, naming the names is the name of the game - without knowing whom we're supposed to address as cabal in particular, potential revolution has a serious shortcoming.
Also, the dark triad, though interesting subject per se, is rather irrelevant for the analysis in my opinion, since cabal's brains are inherently wired in a different way, so these human concepts don't apply to them in the same way as they do to human species. I think it's a rather obvious to note that they're radically different from commoners as you've already expanded on before. I suspect you'd have discovered some new psychological concepts if allowed to study them in person and get to experience the way they think and feel from up close.
With regards to your first cent - I agree, but I would leave that for a separate essay (or, well, series of papers, shall we say!). In these articles I wanted to specifically focus on the psychology rather than digress into identifications. Mind you, what I'm kind of doing here is creating a 'profile', which can then be used in practice to identify and expose named individuals. But I did want to keep that aspect separate, so it's not really an omission on my part. Likewise, let's say the resistance did eventually win (or at least suppress the cabal so they go into hiding again for several hundred years), then this kind of psych profile can be of immense practical use in detecting and neutralising potential monsters before they get into positions of money, power and influence again. It can be taught in schools, for example, to provide people with a greater immunity.
With regards to your second cent, I also agree that their brains are wired differently and you have anticipated where I'm going with part 3! So hold your griffins on that one. Yes, it is obvious, of course, so what I intend to do is discuss the evolutionary and anthropological ramifications and insights of this (it's important to consider how they arose and where they come from etc.). At the same time, by highlighting these differences I'm also helping normal humans to understand themselves by contrast, namely the inherent goodness in a normal human (absent some traumatic/dysfunctional nurture).
Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on which way you look at it, I have in fact been able to study them in person from up close - this happened during my childhood, and it has given me a lot of psychological insight. Much of that insight and experience does of course not only inform my worldview but it's also informing these articles. As I'll get into later, one of the (me as an adult) triggers to all this was finding out a lot more about the child abuse network. It reminded me (i.e. broke through some of my amnesia walls) that the kind of creatures who carry out that sort of horrific abuse can't possibly be human - their brains must, indeed, be wired differently. Having learned a fair bit about neuroscience in later life as an adult I've been able to gain a far greater, and, I don't know, less emotional perhaps, understanding of these monsters.
If I was to give you a link to the article which produced the most significant trigger then it's the IGSP-Studies Beyond Dutroux article about the Belgian X-dossiers. If you haven't read it here's the link: https://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair
That article, if you haven't read it, should come with a serious warning attached because it's beyond disturbing. What you will be interested in though is the later parts of the article in which he does, indeed, name names and expose their ties with all those cabal-oriented NGOs (le Cercle etc.). It's quite a long article though so it'll take you a few goes to get through it (mercifully, to be honest - it's far too much to take in all at one sitting). It also says a fair bit about dissociation and MPD.
The other one to read would of course be Dave McGowan's Programmed to Kill (which forms a nice companion piece to that article).
Anyhow - I'm hoping to have part 3 ready for this weekend. But I am very, very happy you're getting a lot out of this so far! Thanks!
Ouch, Dutroux... I read that one and couldn't agree more with you - that's the darkest and most disturbing content out there by far. If true even in part, it should serve as a warning to all those people in denial about the extent of cruelty some individuals are capable of doing. Thinking about the story from my memory, I was shocked how far up the corruption went and how forcefully those involved were trying to hide all possible revelations when it started to surface in the mainstream media. It's quite worrying since I'm currently residing in Belgium as my job brought me to this country, and quite frankly, there's some dark energy present here which I can't properly describe. Maybe I'm overacting, but I can hardly wait for my project to end so I can return to my beloved home.
Anyway, sorry for going ahead of time and subject.
I have been thinking of doing an autobiographical horror story about all that stuff. It’s coming back to me lately, especially as I get mentally stronger.
Most people wouldn’t believe it though. That’s how they get away with it.
Or it’s so disturbing they just switch off.
I was 7 years old by the way, when the first child game hunt happened. I don’t remember anything else after that. Obviously I woke up later but that was a different me.
If your hypothesis that a separate human strain exists, were accepted worldwide, even without the backing of neuroscientific investigations, it would be a life saver for humanity. It would be so much easier to explain the human history of horror, as well as to prevent it from happening again and again, if people got a firm grip on the existence of such a humanoid species. However, what is necessary is an identifier of the Homo Immanis entities for Homo Sapiens to get a grip on it. Just as you can recognize a person with Down's syndrome, it would be helpful to detect the Homo Immanis on similar phenotypical traits that apply to them.
Unfortunately, there are no visual giveaways. That's not to say that they cannot resemble Homo Sapiens type humanoids despite their terribly defunct wiring. It just makes it harder to detect them, without having direct contact with them. Of course, anyone who promotes or participates in genocide, pedofilism, torture or murder for whatever reason, is by definition a Homo Immanis, and needs to be removed from society immediately. Without these aberrations, there would be no horror in the world. Or is it possible for Homo Sapiens to be a murderer without a conscience too? In that case, Homo Immanis and Homo Sapiens are one and the same, and there simply exists a broad spectrum of malevolent disorders in humanity as a whole, which may be stimulated by personal desires and circumstance. But I do not think that this is the case.
However, without the ability of visual inspection and determination, Homo Sapiens resorts to explanations of 'Fallen angels' and 'satanists' and 'Elite' and 'Illuminati' and etc, and 'demons' that possess human beings. When in fact one can contribute the destructive behavior of Homo Immanis to purely physiological and neurological defects. What is obvious about Homo Immanis, is that they lack creativity, and must heavily rely on a subset of Homo Sapiens to do their bidding. Greed and ambition are generally motivating factors here.
Therefore, along with your hypothesis, I recognize a difference between psychopaths as a subset of Homo Sapiens, and the fullfledged completey different strain of Homo Immanis. It explains the horror in the world, and why Homo Immanis was able to survive all these years - parasitically relying on the Homo Sapiens subset of psychopathic mental cases, thereby controlling the individual and group psychology.
Yes, I think it is right to distinguish between Immanis and psychopaths. There are clear differences. I think one is that psychopaths, although capable of cooperation, are essentially selfish and individualists. Immanis, however, has a very strong (perhaps overwhelming) sense of group identity, to which it may even be subordinate. The survival of the group being more important than the survival of the individual (hence why they favour cults).
Of course they are very happy to make humans pass them off as just psychopaths (or sociopaths, even). So yes, I do think some Sapiens can be socio- or psychopaths - whether they are born that way or made is another question of course. But I do think Immanis has indeed been studying ways to turn more Sapiens into socio- and psychopaths (chronic psychological stress from an early age and into adulthood is one method that springs to mind). I do, in fact, largely think of the MK-Ultra experiments as specifically having these intentions. And of course they would think nothing of experimenting on humans.
And absolutely a general understanding or acceptance of all this would be a life-saver for humanity. That is essentially the underlying purpose of this series, the intention that I had. And the thing is technology/science has gotten to the stage where it would be possible to prove the hypothesis. Although even without proof, I think simply widespread (or even just academic) consideration of the hypothesis would make a real difference. As I say, it makes the whole thing - I mean history, the way the world operates - a lot easier and more palatable for people to understand. The demystifying of evil, I mean.
p.s. as an afterthought... If, as you postulate, Homo Immanis is a small group, then why are there so many killers and predators in this world? History is replete with it: killers, torturers, genocidal maniacs, murderers, pedophiles and sadists. There are many, many many more than just a small group! If the small group of Homo Immanis is the instigator, then where do these throngs of murderous madmen hail from... godforbid from Homo Sapiens? No. In fact, Homo Immanis must be a much larger group than we think. Much larger... with many dormant murderers yet to be awakened. And that means that the group Homo Sapiens is rather small. What is your thought on my afterthought?
Actually it's interesting and pertinent that you bring up that very question, as regards to the population size. I was thinking of looking into that question in a potential part five. Vexman (you may have noticed some of his comments) asked the very same question.
As you say, if you look at the numbers - especially genocidal maniacs (e.g. Bolsheviks/Trotsky's red terror) you are talking a very large number. I was in part thinking in terms of 'as a percentage of the total human population'. So, given there are around 8 billion humans, even if we denote only 1% as Immanis then that's still 80 million. Or even 0.1% is 8 million. I suspect the truth may lie somewhere in between those two. So not only is that a sizeable number, but it's enough to achieve global domination, at least by occupying all the high places.
Of course they'd need 'foot soldiers' and minions - which I guess is where the MK experiments come in. Their question being 'can we do MK on a massive population level' (as opposed to just individuals). I think the answer is yes, because if you atomise society and destroy community spirit, then inflict stress on people, humans tend to go into self-defence mode, which is a kind of self-centred mode, simply for survival purposes - in which case they act like individuals. When you have individualised (isolated) them, then the same MK methods can be deployed. The social group then mutually reinforces the methods/programming (group think).
Likewise they can take advantage of humans relatively low social cognition number (Dunbar's number), namely 150.
Again - these are all vital areas to be studied. And I have noted well that if you look at all the 'agents' or 'cognitive infiltrators' in the so-called conspiracy theory subculture, these are the very topics they avoid talking about, and the topics they attempt to divert attention from. That, to me, is very telling.
What concerns me, is that I see this Immanis behavior among 'normal' Homo Sapiens. I can count a few: one, just back from the Gulf war, happily confided in me "i like to kill people" / another, a neighbor, said he was surprised I had no desire to kill people, because he did / another, a friend at the uni, said he hoped to find a corpse during our walks in the mountains / another recounted that he had killed at least 260 'gooks' while in Vietnam. There seems to be a penchant or a desire for killing in seemingly 'normal' Homo Sapiens people; people that have not been subjected to MKultra or other sinister training. Unless it's just big talk, except for the Gulf war guy, who truly spoke the truth to me, and the Vietnam vet. He asked to keep it to myself. He just wanted to confirm something I had written about; a model about behavior and killing. Maybe from the four examples, he was a true H. Immanis. Notice also that the desire to kill possesses mostly men. That too, is avoided as a topic.
Yeah - that is a worrying trend. Perhaps it can partly be explained by the war against the spirit, involving, amongst other things, the inflicting of over a thousand years of the monotheistic ideology on people. Essentially a form of long-term conditioning.
That suggests a very thought out long-term strategy…
I have more to tell you / share with you. But not via this means. :-)
p.s. i'm adding the word "male" to the monotheistic ideology. Lastly, the purpose of the vax ties into your hypothesis of the H. Immanis. (nothing to do with virus or covid, that's all ruses.)
Yes, although rather than necessarily 'male' it would certainly be 'patriarchal' or 'patriarchy' or similar. It's done immeasurable damage to humanity, and the world. Well, and me when I was a child too, for that matter.
Right.... and it continues to do so, this 'male prerogative.' I can point to an immense bulwark of male collaboration, perversion and abuse, and tremendous amounts of money and wealth, running the world. As for your personal experiences, share it only with your inner circle of trust, not on this open forum, for your own good and well being... I embrace you across the distance.