I do concur with many of the points you've raised, but as you might have noticed in our discussions so far, I have some disagreement with a few of them.
The viruses being one of them, for instance. I don't know if you have ever researched or studied this peculiar subject. If you did, however, I'm sure you would've noticed there are serious shortcomings with the underlying hypothesis and scientific method applied to establishing repeatable results when trying to prove these mythical entities from the realm of unobservable.
One point which is definitely in need of serious revision is the application of the term isolation. It is unfortunately one of those stolen and misapplied words - in the world of reasonable, isolation means separation of one thing from another / everything else. Except in virology, somehow. When and if you take a closer look at their isolation methods, you can clearly notice that their isolate contains, among other things, at least one foreign organic matter (either green monkey kidney cells or bovine fetus material) in addition to human cells, and other chemicals such as antibiotics, formaldehyde, etc... After such soup is cooked, they go further with the process and apply centrifuge to it in order to layer this mix and arbitrarily set the range where alleged virus material can be found. Then they extract a tiny amount of it and further prepare it for e-microscopy adding some more chemicals and put it in a vaccum, deepfreeze it and then finally radiate it with electron stream in order to visualise it. Of course, they also ignore the fact than any living cell is alienated from its original environment and when it eventually dies and strats falling appart as per natural decomposition, they conclude it is because.... virus killed it, of course.
So there you go. I don't know about you, but this is nothing scientific and on top of it, all those pictures you're able to find on the net as some kind of proof for virus existence, are mostly CGI. But I'll digress here and leave you to come to your own conclusions about this particular issue, as it's not particularly important in the context of your articles and cabal per se.
Yeah - I was very consciously trying to avoid the biochemistry/virus issue here (in the same way I've been trying - not completely successfully probably) to avoid getting into any particular conspiracy theory, or at least the details of a particular theory, but rather try and rein myself in to only focus on psychology.
I think I mentioned in the Circe & Witchfinder intro post (at the end, with my little list of potential articles) that I would want to do a post specifically about the virus issue. So again I'm attempting to be disciplined and keep it separate!
One thing I would say, however, at this stage is that I actually know a lot indeed about biochemistry and medical science, having earned at least a sporadic living translating some high-end medical research-related stuff over the last 20-odd years. Again, rather than go into it here in detail the first observation I'd make is that there seems to be a lot of misrepresentation about the process of isolation, as well as the chemical analysis of viruses. Viruses - or what we call viruses - aren't necessarily a living organism - I'm actually on the side of the debate that thinks of viruses as not actually living organisms, but rather complex collections of nucleotides (i.e. chemical molecules, made of RNA/DNA). In a sense, they are the precursors of 'life' and a kind of bridge between pure chemistry, and 'biology'. Biology, in the end, being simply very complex chemistry. So I do not deny that these chemicals exist, I simply view them differently to most people.
Anyway - I will really have to go into this in more detail later - one thing I do admit for now, though, is that I probably haven't looked deeply enough into the arguments made by the anti-virology people to do a sufficiently comprehensive analysis yet - it would take a lot of work and I'd have to expand my list of scientific papers on the subject in my favourites folders (I have a fair few already but I'd need some more to be comprehensive).
Anyhow - sorry for the digression - I think the point I was making with the criticism of Off-G's 'covid doesn't exist' was simply that in pushing that idea they are making people disbelieve in the scientific possibility of a biochemical weapon (whether that weapon is a 'virus' or just complex biochemistry is irrelevant for the argument), thus acting as a kind of coverup, if you see what I mean.
One obvious logical and scientific point here is that if you don't believe in the existence of Sars-Cov2, or viruses for that matter, then you have to explain what the mRNA jabs are without recourse to any idea at all of a substance called 'RNA', or a 'spike protein' (remember a 'spike protein' is simply a complex chemical molecule). If there is, after all, a 'spike protein' in the injections, then you have to accept the fact that this complex chemical molecule is having chemical reactions with specific parts and areas of the human body - with dangerous results. So if there's no such thing as Sars-Cov2, what is in the jabs? Hopefully you get my argument here? It's not actually anything to do with whether viruses do or don't exist - but it's associating it with the idea that viruses don't exist, and thus misdirecting people's attention away from understanding the bioweapon (the mRNA jabs) simply in terms of chemistry.
Of course I don't discount the very real possibility that no one who writes for Off-G knows a damn thing about biochemistry or virology etc.! That may, tbh, be a more innocent and simple explanation for what otherwise seems like deliberate disinformation peddling.
Yeah, this it totally going to require a separate article!
So all I will say now is hold your thoughts on the virus issue - we'll get to that in a different place.
One simple word which explains what we're dealing with in terms of covid jabs: morgellons.
You may want to check this link, it's got collections of some of the videos now deleted from social media where they were originally posted. Imo, jabs are about the new technology they're experimenting with on us as the non-consensual test subjects.
another issue, of course, is that they chose to let it go 'viral'. Almost as if our various delightful governments (I use the word loosely) wanted to make a lot of money for Big Pharma?
Same goes for all the other central banks, Libya was the last on the list outside the Kabal.
The "New World Order" at it's core, is a financial plan, to coral all the non western countries into a controlled barrel of exploitable resources, at the expense of the west, then get them all into the big cage match at the end of the world, and profit from the chaos.
I do understand what you're saying here, and I have been very minded to tackle the issue of the fake binary/all in it together in a proper essay. The most important word/concept one has to consider about all this is the word 'deterrent'. Unless we are saying that pretty much every world leader and everyone else in their governments, economies, intelligence agencies, media, and so on, are members of the same social group known as the cabal (which I do not believe - I'll hopefully address that consideration in a later part of this series), then in order to make people comply with the agenda you have to hold some kind of threat over them, and that threat has to be very, very serious. I am going to designate this threat by the name of 'Samson Option' (although it isn't necessarily nuclear, but it is an Extinction Level Event (ELE) kind of 'mutual assured destruction'). So what appears, on the surface, to be complicity in the agenda is actually a very dangerous form of 'playing the long game', and attempting to manoeuvre into a position where you can neutralise the threat.
I will also put forward the suggestion, when I move on to Witchfinder, that a lot of the cognitive infiltration and control over the so-called truth movement is precisely designed to misdirect attention away from an awareness of this. Thus they get people talking about fake binaries and 'the great reset'. The truth is the great reset, if it's about people being happy, is the very last thing they can afford to allow to happen because their entire subjugation of the population is achieved through inflicting trauma on people. People who are happy cannot be controlled. This is why a 'technofeudalist' or 'totalitarian' version of the GR (Brave New World) can never, psychology, happen. Because it wouldn't last very long. At the same time, an overtly totalitarian technofeudalist system could also not last because there would be a resistance. The survival of the cabal, in the face of overwhelming numbers, depends entirely on concealment.
It would be far too long to address all of this in a reply to you here (I'm already getting quite long), but one point I would consider is that if 'control over a country's central bank' (i.e. the money supply) as well as banks like the IMF is the primary mechanism by which the cabal control everything, then that's one of the flimsiest control mechanisms there is. Why? Because there would be nothing at all stopping any country/government from simply nationalising that central bank and therefore the money supply. They then cancel the 'national debt' (because you don't owe yourself money) and start printing new money. They then lift everyone out of poverty, invest in a targeted way, nationalise other cabal-oriented industries like big pharma and big ag etc. and become the most prosperous country on the planet. The rest of the world takes notice and you end with a domino effect leading to the end of the cabal. This is the point about 'liberal socialism'.
Ironically, this taking back control over the money supply is what Germany did in 1933 - in my view this is the real reason why WW2 was made to happen. The idea the cabal cared about 'fascism' is absurd - they're fascists themselves, after all.
Anyway - what I'm really saying here is that the fake binary is only superficial - there is a massive level of espionage and game theory going on beneath the surface, and this is the classified stuff they really, really cannot allow people to know about. Hence the amount of effort they have put into controlling the world of online independent investigation (conspiracy theories etc.). If the likes of OFF-G didn't exist, it would be necessary to invent it.
Oh, here's a fun thing - translate the letters O-F-F into alphanumerics (in which you have 0-9, then A=10, B=11 etc.) By my reckoning that's 24-15-15. You can work the rest out yourself.
Personally, I genuinely believe that the ELE-deterrent is about to be neutralised, and the wars we are seeing springing up now is the final act of desperation and panic by the bad guys. WW3 is, I believe, going to happen, and it's going to be very, very messy and traumatic.
2nd reply (read other one first if you haven't already).
Another observation I'd make, which is equally important, is that one thing that did confuse me to begin with was that one of the most obvious ways to take down the American-led Empire is to expose the child abuse network to the public. Any intelligence agency could do this, especially the Russians or Chinese. If it was made public then the entire population would go all rage zombie at that sheer horror of it and physically tear the cabal apart, along with anyone else responsible for covering it up.
So why don't they do it? Because this would be an obvious trigger to initiate the ELE-deterrent, as it's an existentialist threat (to the cabal).
So from this point of view, I can understand and sympathise (to an extent) with the intelligence agencies and all their cognitive infiltration programme because it's vitally important to prevent the triggering of the ELE-deterrent.
I may not be happy with them, for obvious psychological reasons, but I can understand them and, at least to a limited extent, approve.
Given they will certainly have someone reading every word I say, I hope they can take very good note of that comment.
I'll reply here for both of your replies to ImpObs.
When you say (I'm paraphrasing here) that unless every world government, intelligence agencies, etc., are members of cabal... - I think you're excluding this option as reality for the sake of the argument. Considering the fact that they've deliberately installed or invented nations, borders and replaced kingdoms with States - then, in my opinion, it was done with an agenda to remove themselves as those directly exposed to the reaction of the people for their misdeeds. In past times, when some event or policy of the self-imposed rulers would trigger the people to revolt, they would go knocking down doors straight to the king's or Counts', etc., home. So they have cunningly "removed" themselves from the frontline by installing "democracy" and people's representatives as "parliament" and institutions as to prevent direct identification of those really responsible for misdeeds. In this perspective, it's very important to have exact and concrete information about the people - they need to know in advance what's cookin' among plebs. The fear of extinction guides them. Thus they invented intelligence services. These act not against any kind of espionage among the nations (which are their own invention pushed into reality), but against those individuals they deem dangerous for their hegemony. People in general are extremely naive and tend to let themselves being guided and ruled, which is nothing worrying per se. But some individuals can see through the fog and incite others to revolt, with an idea to remove the cabal for the better life in the aftermath and not for position of power. And this needs to be prevented, rooted out before it even starts unfolding, hence all their control instruments installed everywhere. In this perspective, it's absolutely necessary to have control of all anti-governmental movements and ideas. Even better, they invent and control all the opposition themselves and even brag about it between the lines (to those who still read any texts longer than 160 symbols). The method or instrument of control is known as controlled opposition. So as evident, the instruments of control are all these institutions - the state, the government, the parliament, intelligence services, alternative parties, imaginary dichotomies, et al.
On another note, and as to my personal experience after having observed the politics for cca 3 decades already- all these people's representative have done absolutely nothing for the better of the people, worldwide. Excluding some bread & circus, money spent on nothing worth mentioning, the real changes in society have never occurred by the way of parliament and their decisions or laws. Or any revolution or real resistance. All those we know about from his-story, were controlled and instigated by cabal themselves to impose societal changes that further remove the people from being able to endanger their hegemony. For instance, the consequence of French revolution (as shown to be controlled op event led by the cabal by Mathis), was the introduction of parliament as an apparatus of control of the people by giving them an alleged opportunity to choose their own representatives. One would naively think that this was going to change things for the better. But in reality, it is laughable from the perspective of the cabal. It is in fact, an ingenious plan how to deceive the people into believing that they have taken over the positions of power and took over the control of anything important. It's extremely naive to believe that, in the first place, the power on that level is being handed over by the means of voting poles. All those representatives are inherently cabal's own peons, meaning they are cunning the people by making them believe otherwise (aka democracy; the supposed rule of the people). If this was not true, we would have seen some positive attempts to remove the cabal by now. As to my knowledge, nothing like that happened anywhere until this very moment.
Secondly, when talking about their miniscule numbers - thin about the psychology of the prisoners vs guards: in all cases the prisoners outnumber their guards by thousands to one -> yet you almost never see any kind of resistance or revolt happening. The prisoners could, if they wanted to, wring their guards' necks in the first instant. But they never do. Some of the prisoners maybe chose to devise the plan to escape and possibly a few of them work together to do it in reality. While all the rest simply give in and capitulate in their heads. It's really mindboggling trying to understand this psychology, but that's the reality of it. Meaning, to achieve total control of the plebs, you don't have to control entire government or State, parliament, etc... As they obviously know and have mastered, you only need a few peons to achieve it. And how do you control your own peons so they wouldn't seize power for themselves? By compromising their integrity with bribery, sex and fear of getting exposed. As evident for itself if one pays even small amount of attention to their mainstream media mouthpieces. Anyway, in short words - the pack of wolves is always howling together - no one can enter their pack and refuse to howl; if you don't, you're not getting inside.
Your initial point is well made and it's something I was definitely going to try and address at some point (you're correct I was making the assumption for the purposes of the argument). It is vitally important to at least attempt to get an idea of numbers, that's to say the total population size of Immanis. Not all Immanis are cabal, however - they would certainly have alphas-to-epsilons, I'm sure.
I suspect that their population size is, in fact, somewhat linked with their social cognition number, which I would imagine is different from Sapiens, and most likely somewhat lower (hence their paranoia and fear). To find this out would be a crucial discovery. Unfortunately the chance of doing any proper neuroscientific studies on these creatures is extremely low. They've probably done it on themselves, for sure, but they wouldn't tell us about it (e.g. Nat Rothschild did a Masters in Addiction Studies - and curiously he doesn't have children - maybe he doesn't want to pass the infection on to the next generation - if so, that's a hugely serious and significant development, certainly in terms of self-awareness - remember he's the only male child of his late father).
I am however still of the opinion that the population size of Immanis (absolute, not just relative to Sapiens) is much lower than they would like us to believe. This is, I admit, more of an instinctive hunch than based on any significant evidence, but I'm sure if I thought about it enough with regards to a proper study of history then I could come up with a good estimate, and possibly some proof of my assumption that they're fewer than they make out.
Maybe that may become clear in a further part of this series.
Interestingly, it is perhaps related to your final paragraph about prisoners. What you say is not strictly true I don't think. Remember prisoners in a prison don't get the opportunity to fight back because they are locked in cells and even in a riot they can't get outside. In an open air prison, however, or a concentration camp, say, it's a different story. But this also presumes they know they have nothing left to lose, and are all in there for either life sentences or death sentences. In which case, absolutely you would see the fight or flight response. Present day Gaza is a good example - apparently Hamas have massively increased their numbers with all those men of fighting age who have realised they have nothing left to lose (where previously they didn't display a fight or flight response because they convinced themselves to still have hope).
So it does totally depend on the circumstances, and the beliefs of the prisoners. it's important for the guards/cabal to convince the prisoners that 'all is not lost' - otherwise they will face the ultimate revolution. That's the real trick about democracy and 'opposition parties' by the way (yes, of course they're controlled, I agree) - it does provide that deception that 'things may get better'.
That's the really dangerous game the cabal are really playing here. They can't achieve totalitarianism without destroying the illusion that 'things might get better'. Once that illusion isn't there anymore, unless they have evened the odds in terms of numbers, then the ultimate revolution will happen and they will be exterminated in toto.
There are also different reactions to trauma of course - not just the freeze reaction. Anyway, you made some good points in your comment for sure and all of it is definitely meriting of consideration for all this stuff. This is becoming a much bigger topic than I first thought it would be! We'll end up writing an entire book at this rate!
Sorry Evelyn, the BRICs 5D chess, white hat BS, is intellectual-lite nonsense, as evidenced by being the same line the controlled-oppersition Q-tard psy-op takes. Read the China-Russia UN document showing they're both all in on the UN Agenda 2030 plan. Both Jabbed up their populations with the death jabs (as did 99% of the rest of the world).
Re the Central Bank thing, look what happened to Libya, Gaddaffi was trying to introduce a gold backed currency for Africa to break the Kabals monopoly. First thing the "allies" did when they went in was to open a new central bank, even before they topped Gadaffi.
On a lower level, look what happened to Liz Truss in the UK, she had the unfortunate luck to be voted leader of the ruling Conservatives and become PM, when the Kabal preferred Sunak, democracy got in the way of the Kabal so the BOE stopped buying bonds and sent the markets into turmoil, at the same time using the Kabal media to blame it all on her mini budget. She lasted ~3 weeks after that little democratic myoclonic jerk.
I agree they're going to pull the WW3 pin tho, besides the depopulation bonus, I can't see any other way they'd get the cherry on top of their world contol cake, digital ID (for security, we're at war stupid) and CBDC because we need a global financial reset to pay for all the destruction, rebuild, and reparations (again).
I've heard that point of course about China and Russia jabbing their own people, but I've yet to hear anyone provide me with the proof that what was in their injections was the same as the so-called mRNA stuff. If I was them I'd make damn sure it wasn't the same shit. Either a placebo or a genuine vaccine against a potential American bioweapon (to be released under cover of Covid).
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't UN agenda2030 the same as the GR? In which case it's not important.
Your points about the banks were answered already, but it does further remind me to do an economics explainer article soon. Although in my error I should've added earlier that on top of taking back control over the central bank & money supply I would obviously fix the value of the currency by fixing the prices of all the various necessary resources/commodities. That way the so-called 'markets' become impotent, and we have an economy based entirely on the 'real economy'. The 'markets' remember do not exist, they are a combination of the parasite bankers plus a bunch of coke-snorting wide boys in the City. They have fuck all to do with the real economy, which is simply the exchange of real physical objects and services conducted by normal people every day. Example - does a cow produce more or less milk if the 'markets' change the value of the currency? No. Now extrapolate to every other necessity of existence.
Prices don't put themselves up, people put prices up. Thus, I would have eliminated inflation at the same time. If we're talking Britain here then obviously I would have already taken control over the City of London. Naturally, though, your point about Gaddafi is extremely pertinent. The reason he was not able to succeed however was because the bad guys had a bigger military force. Of course in order for me, in this hypothetical scenario in which I become dictatrix of Britannia, to do all this stuff I would need the support of the army and the intel services. Assuming I had that, then I would immediately establish my deterrent which is a very large group of sleeper agents with a long list of names of everyone in the cabal, and their entire families. But that's another story.
With regards to Liz Truss, I think the better explanation is that the entire episode was planned and scripted in advance. After all, they simply couldn't have a brown man in number 10 when their ER2 was laid to rest and Charlie boy was installed in Fuckingham Palace now, could they? It also coincided with the Nordstream attack, if I remember correctly. But certainly my above points about economics apply. You must always remember the difference between 'the markets' and the real economy. The cabal have no control over the real economy, ultimately. The problem is that normal people have been prevented from knowing and understanding that.
Likewise, the fact of a bunch of parasites fucking with our economy arbitrarily as a result of the Truss/Kwarteng proposed budget - remember this was before they'd even done anything - should've been a wake up call. Unfortunately, it wasn't.
You prompted another thought/insight - for which I am grateful - thank you for your comments because it's good to be challenged.
My thought was that it's a logical fallacy to mistake the method with the affiliation. That's to say, just because the BRICS may appear to use similar methods to the American-led bloc, doesn't necessarily mean they are on the same side. It's a bit like two mafia groups fighting over the same territory, but employing all the same behaviours.
I'm also absolutely not suggesting that BRICS are 'good guys' simply because they're enemies of the obvious bad guys. Same as, say, WW2, in which the Allies were demonstrably not 'good guys' (although they tried to make people think they were), but just because Germany was resisting that cabal doesn't logically mean they were 'good'. Most of them were a bunch of nasty, patriarchal racists after all.
Perhaps 'rivals' might be a better word than 'resistance' then. I can go with that one.
Anyway - as if right on cue, or as if they really are paying very close attention to everything I'm writing (they'd be negligent if they didn't, after all), Off-G (who I am now designating 'The Devil's Guardian') have published yet another anti-BRICS/Russian hit piece. This one is by a new contributor hey hey! And he has a Substack. Calls himself '009'. These people are exceptionally blatant - it's the psychology of the big lie of course.
One thing I was going to add to my comment below is the 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' idea (I believe this '009' cutout has already done a hit piece against that very phrase - and thus the strategic logic of it).
My home country (Britannia) has endured vassal status for a very long time (since 1066), but vassal status of the American Empire most recently. In the event of WW3, the Empire would lose and thus all those vassal states would be liberated. Yes, they'd lie in ruins, and have to spend decades repairing, but they would be free. Some people might say another group of criminals would take charge - which is highly likely - but those criminals could not possibly be Russia or China, precisely because of the promotion of nasty, racist nationalism by the Empire and its vassals. Some 99% of the British population would instantly resist Russian or Chinese occupation because it would be so overt, so that occupation/new vassal status simply wouldn't hold.
And this, I say, is why the intel cutouts like TDG are pushing their narrative. Or at least one reason. The most important thing, after all, is what happens after the liberation. This is the entire point of my own agenda and the Liberal Socialism thing. It's about independence, along with an immunity from malevolent governance, let alone vassal status. Know your enemy. And ironically, I do it because I do, as it happens, love my country. If the Circus have a plan for benevolent liberation to oppose the inevitable Bolshevik-like coup piggybacking on the revolution then count me in.
Once we have discovered a cutout, we can then eliminate their narrative from the list of hypotheses. So that's a big step forward.
Just as well their algorithm has me blocked from commenting before I've even left a comment or minded to leave one. Their other option would be to let me comment and do a dogpile. That might be a fun provocation test for a while but it would soon get tedious. So I'll just continue studying them, from an espionage and counter-subversion perspective.
replying to all your replies in one: Spunik vaccine is a viral vector delivery system, rather than mRNA delivery, both get your cells to make cytotoxic spike protiens, so it's the same as J&J and AZ's bioweapon.
China/sinovac used a virus particle vax, i.e. they injected just the cytotoxic spike protiens directly.
The problem is that the spike protien, when either made by your own cells a la mRNA/Viral vetor, or directly injected a la Sinovac, which can pass the BBB, contain a prionergic peptide sequence, that can cause a cascade of misfolded protiens (Prions). There is no safe dose of Prions. Prion diseases take 5-10yrs to show symptoms, they are called different names relating to the area of the brain where the cascade starts, Alzheimer's, Parkinsons etc. etc.
To understand propagation effects in populations, look at CWD in deer in the US, it started in Montanna in the 80's (next to Rocky Mountain labs who were studying Prions) and is now in all US states deer populations. Prions can survive autoclaving, can survive in soil, be taken up by plants, and passed on to those eating said plants. The first symptoms will be a raise in impulse control disorders, a handy bioweapon for anyone wanting to see a rise in public dis-order, and/or depopulation, with plausible deniability for themselves.
So yeah, same bioweapon effect the west got, different delivery mechanism. You can learn more about this from Dr K McCairn in these videos:
Markets are priced on supply and demand, not just coke snorting bankster market makers. You can't have fixed pricing at point of sale, it doesn't work, for the simple reason any comodity is not just priced on it's intrinsic value, it's priced including supply chain costs, including transport (i.e. it's cheaper at source than it is shipped to the other end of the world/country) and labout costs (one reason Chinese crap is cheaper than US crap).
It works the same way with comodity backed currency, eventually there's not enough comodity to back currency requirements (e.g. gold standard) when there's not enough currency to go around it's called a recession. Of course the current system of printing money out of thin air and charging interest on it is corrupt as fuck, and why the globalists now own pretty much the whole world, because they have a monopoly on the printing and surplus (interest) gathering.
If the system was owned by the people, with money issued and retracted on a supply and demand baisis, rather than printed by private banks bearing interest, we'd be a whole nother level of better.
You seem to have an extremely myopic view of basic economics.
I don't believe you can't post on Off-G at all, I've been on thier naughty step for at least a couple of years but my posts escape pending evey time eventually, I've heard the same experience from others who post counter to Off-G narratives.
I thought 009 made some good points in that Off-G post, shame you couldn't answer any of them with more than a dismissive armwave.
It helps if you read the actual post we're commenting on. I quoted part of the 8th paragraph, second sentence, 9th line, under [24-10-19]. Here's the whole, rather long, sentence.
"Aside from the suspicion that the two chief editors, Kit Knightly and Catte Black, have the same name, their ‘playing down of the cabal’s evil’ by focusing people’s attention on the pathetic ‘Great Reset’ (yeah, it is pathetic and I will have to dissect it as such in a later paper – simply to say that an evil cabal would never have their abusive pathology satisfied by having citizens who are ‘happy’ even if they own nothing – they want 1984, not Brave New World), and their ‘fake binary’ narrative (which could easily be construed as a disguised anti-BRICS propaganda (i.e. anti-the resistance); not to mention subliminally making people feel that resistance is futile, thus generating learned helplessness/the freeze response – that’s a typical shill article, by the way – try it – it’s almost as if they are reading what I’m saying in this series!), we also have tropes like promoting the transphobia cult along with a ‘bioweapons don’t really exist because Sars-Cov2 never existed because viruses don’t exist so why don’t you all just shut up and go back to sleep, eh? Nothing to see here."
It might help if you could brush up your reading comprehension skills even? Just a thought?
To try to claim that I didn't read the post is downright insulting frankly. The fact that you can't justify your claim by analysing the text tells me all I need to know about you.
I can quote the words for you, but I can't understand them for you.
It may help if you could brush up on your logic skills, just a thought.
Evie described the Off-G narative as anti-BRICs propaganda qualifiying that statement as equaling "Anti-the resistance" with her i.e. statement in brackets. Therefore if Off-G=anti-BRICs also = Anti-The Resistance, THEN> BRICS=The Resistance in Evie's statement.
The fact that you didn't understand this on reading the intial post, or with requoting the intial post, or with Evie's subsiquent reply attempting to defend this position, tells me all I need to know about you.
I could probably intervene at this point and maybe clarify what I meant, because I did use the word 'resistance' of course, and you're kind of both right. Obviously, if one thinks the multipolar world order is the enemy, then of course BRICS is the protagonist, not the resistance. If, however, we're talking about the American-led Empire as the protagonist then BRICS, even if it represents an equally undesirable if different version of a new world order, is certainly a 'resistance' to the Empire, even if it's also a 'bad guy'. So by calling them a 'resistance' I am not necessarily endorsing them. And I do not accept the idea that they really are 'all in it together', for the simple psychological reason that the controllers of the Empire would never accept anything less than total world domination, which is unipolarity, not multipolarity.
I certainly should've clarified it by saying resistance to what in particular. So that's my mistake.
There are certainly some obvious attributes of countries like Russia, China, India etc. which are very negative indeed, and I certainly wouldn't want to live in a system in which they imposed their 'values' on my own life or country. But I think this is where the idea of 'nationalism' comes in. Nationalism has been so heavily promoted that it would be somewhat impossible to impose a 'foreign' way of life on a particular country (e.g. Britain; France would be similar I guess - and certainly America), whether that is a supranational 'order' or a Russian or Chinese or whatever. That includes the UN.
Because the 'nationalist blocs' consider the imposition of, say, Agenda2030 or Great Reset as a threat, this has, unfortunately, turned their nationalism from simple pride in one's own cultural identity into a very nasty right-wing quasi-fascism, perceived by them as 'self defence'. One suspects, ironically, that this has been deliberate and intended.
This nationalism, though, should be equally directed against the American Empire, which is demonstrably attempting (and succeeding to a large extent, especially in Europe) to impose its own 'values' on its vassals.
I guess the 'resistance' is not a simple homogenous thing, but is itself varied and multipolar...
Another great article in the series!
I do concur with many of the points you've raised, but as you might have noticed in our discussions so far, I have some disagreement with a few of them.
The viruses being one of them, for instance. I don't know if you have ever researched or studied this peculiar subject. If you did, however, I'm sure you would've noticed there are serious shortcomings with the underlying hypothesis and scientific method applied to establishing repeatable results when trying to prove these mythical entities from the realm of unobservable.
One point which is definitely in need of serious revision is the application of the term isolation. It is unfortunately one of those stolen and misapplied words - in the world of reasonable, isolation means separation of one thing from another / everything else. Except in virology, somehow. When and if you take a closer look at their isolation methods, you can clearly notice that their isolate contains, among other things, at least one foreign organic matter (either green monkey kidney cells or bovine fetus material) in addition to human cells, and other chemicals such as antibiotics, formaldehyde, etc... After such soup is cooked, they go further with the process and apply centrifuge to it in order to layer this mix and arbitrarily set the range where alleged virus material can be found. Then they extract a tiny amount of it and further prepare it for e-microscopy adding some more chemicals and put it in a vaccum, deepfreeze it and then finally radiate it with electron stream in order to visualise it. Of course, they also ignore the fact than any living cell is alienated from its original environment and when it eventually dies and strats falling appart as per natural decomposition, they conclude it is because.... virus killed it, of course.
So there you go. I don't know about you, but this is nothing scientific and on top of it, all those pictures you're able to find on the net as some kind of proof for virus existence, are mostly CGI. But I'll digress here and leave you to come to your own conclusions about this particular issue, as it's not particularly important in the context of your articles and cabal per se.
Yeah - I was very consciously trying to avoid the biochemistry/virus issue here (in the same way I've been trying - not completely successfully probably) to avoid getting into any particular conspiracy theory, or at least the details of a particular theory, but rather try and rein myself in to only focus on psychology.
I think I mentioned in the Circe & Witchfinder intro post (at the end, with my little list of potential articles) that I would want to do a post specifically about the virus issue. So again I'm attempting to be disciplined and keep it separate!
One thing I would say, however, at this stage is that I actually know a lot indeed about biochemistry and medical science, having earned at least a sporadic living translating some high-end medical research-related stuff over the last 20-odd years. Again, rather than go into it here in detail the first observation I'd make is that there seems to be a lot of misrepresentation about the process of isolation, as well as the chemical analysis of viruses. Viruses - or what we call viruses - aren't necessarily a living organism - I'm actually on the side of the debate that thinks of viruses as not actually living organisms, but rather complex collections of nucleotides (i.e. chemical molecules, made of RNA/DNA). In a sense, they are the precursors of 'life' and a kind of bridge between pure chemistry, and 'biology'. Biology, in the end, being simply very complex chemistry. So I do not deny that these chemicals exist, I simply view them differently to most people.
Anyway - I will really have to go into this in more detail later - one thing I do admit for now, though, is that I probably haven't looked deeply enough into the arguments made by the anti-virology people to do a sufficiently comprehensive analysis yet - it would take a lot of work and I'd have to expand my list of scientific papers on the subject in my favourites folders (I have a fair few already but I'd need some more to be comprehensive).
Anyhow - sorry for the digression - I think the point I was making with the criticism of Off-G's 'covid doesn't exist' was simply that in pushing that idea they are making people disbelieve in the scientific possibility of a biochemical weapon (whether that weapon is a 'virus' or just complex biochemistry is irrelevant for the argument), thus acting as a kind of coverup, if you see what I mean.
One obvious logical and scientific point here is that if you don't believe in the existence of Sars-Cov2, or viruses for that matter, then you have to explain what the mRNA jabs are without recourse to any idea at all of a substance called 'RNA', or a 'spike protein' (remember a 'spike protein' is simply a complex chemical molecule). If there is, after all, a 'spike protein' in the injections, then you have to accept the fact that this complex chemical molecule is having chemical reactions with specific parts and areas of the human body - with dangerous results. So if there's no such thing as Sars-Cov2, what is in the jabs? Hopefully you get my argument here? It's not actually anything to do with whether viruses do or don't exist - but it's associating it with the idea that viruses don't exist, and thus misdirecting people's attention away from understanding the bioweapon (the mRNA jabs) simply in terms of chemistry.
Of course I don't discount the very real possibility that no one who writes for Off-G knows a damn thing about biochemistry or virology etc.! That may, tbh, be a more innocent and simple explanation for what otherwise seems like deliberate disinformation peddling.
Yeah, this it totally going to require a separate article!
So all I will say now is hold your thoughts on the virus issue - we'll get to that in a different place.
Ok, noted.
One simple word which explains what we're dealing with in terms of covid jabs: morgellons.
You may want to check this link, it's got collections of some of the videos now deleted from social media where they were originally posted. Imo, jabs are about the new technology they're experimenting with on us as the non-consensual test subjects.
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/must-see-vaccine-video-clips-that?utm_source=publication-search
another issue, of course, is that they chose to let it go 'viral'. Almost as if our various delightful governments (I use the word loosely) wanted to make a lot of money for Big Pharma?
"anti-BRICS propaganda (i.e. anti-the resistance)"
You think BRICs is THE resistance? Sorry to burst your bubble:
Do you realise the original white paper, i.e. the original planning document for the BRICs, was written by Goldman Sachs?
https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/history/moments/2001-brics
Russias central bank (and all it's oil) is owned by the Rothschilds.
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/fun-fact-did-you-know-that-the-rothschilds
Same goes for all the other central banks, Libya was the last on the list outside the Kabal.
The "New World Order" at it's core, is a financial plan, to coral all the non western countries into a controlled barrel of exploitable resources, at the expense of the west, then get them all into the big cage match at the end of the world, and profit from the chaos.
Meet the new world boss, same as the old one.
I do understand what you're saying here, and I have been very minded to tackle the issue of the fake binary/all in it together in a proper essay. The most important word/concept one has to consider about all this is the word 'deterrent'. Unless we are saying that pretty much every world leader and everyone else in their governments, economies, intelligence agencies, media, and so on, are members of the same social group known as the cabal (which I do not believe - I'll hopefully address that consideration in a later part of this series), then in order to make people comply with the agenda you have to hold some kind of threat over them, and that threat has to be very, very serious. I am going to designate this threat by the name of 'Samson Option' (although it isn't necessarily nuclear, but it is an Extinction Level Event (ELE) kind of 'mutual assured destruction'). So what appears, on the surface, to be complicity in the agenda is actually a very dangerous form of 'playing the long game', and attempting to manoeuvre into a position where you can neutralise the threat.
I will also put forward the suggestion, when I move on to Witchfinder, that a lot of the cognitive infiltration and control over the so-called truth movement is precisely designed to misdirect attention away from an awareness of this. Thus they get people talking about fake binaries and 'the great reset'. The truth is the great reset, if it's about people being happy, is the very last thing they can afford to allow to happen because their entire subjugation of the population is achieved through inflicting trauma on people. People who are happy cannot be controlled. This is why a 'technofeudalist' or 'totalitarian' version of the GR (Brave New World) can never, psychology, happen. Because it wouldn't last very long. At the same time, an overtly totalitarian technofeudalist system could also not last because there would be a resistance. The survival of the cabal, in the face of overwhelming numbers, depends entirely on concealment.
It would be far too long to address all of this in a reply to you here (I'm already getting quite long), but one point I would consider is that if 'control over a country's central bank' (i.e. the money supply) as well as banks like the IMF is the primary mechanism by which the cabal control everything, then that's one of the flimsiest control mechanisms there is. Why? Because there would be nothing at all stopping any country/government from simply nationalising that central bank and therefore the money supply. They then cancel the 'national debt' (because you don't owe yourself money) and start printing new money. They then lift everyone out of poverty, invest in a targeted way, nationalise other cabal-oriented industries like big pharma and big ag etc. and become the most prosperous country on the planet. The rest of the world takes notice and you end with a domino effect leading to the end of the cabal. This is the point about 'liberal socialism'.
Ironically, this taking back control over the money supply is what Germany did in 1933 - in my view this is the real reason why WW2 was made to happen. The idea the cabal cared about 'fascism' is absurd - they're fascists themselves, after all.
Anyway - what I'm really saying here is that the fake binary is only superficial - there is a massive level of espionage and game theory going on beneath the surface, and this is the classified stuff they really, really cannot allow people to know about. Hence the amount of effort they have put into controlling the world of online independent investigation (conspiracy theories etc.). If the likes of OFF-G didn't exist, it would be necessary to invent it.
Oh, here's a fun thing - translate the letters O-F-F into alphanumerics (in which you have 0-9, then A=10, B=11 etc.) By my reckoning that's 24-15-15. You can work the rest out yourself.
Personally, I genuinely believe that the ELE-deterrent is about to be neutralised, and the wars we are seeing springing up now is the final act of desperation and panic by the bad guys. WW3 is, I believe, going to happen, and it's going to be very, very messy and traumatic.
2nd reply (read other one first if you haven't already).
Another observation I'd make, which is equally important, is that one thing that did confuse me to begin with was that one of the most obvious ways to take down the American-led Empire is to expose the child abuse network to the public. Any intelligence agency could do this, especially the Russians or Chinese. If it was made public then the entire population would go all rage zombie at that sheer horror of it and physically tear the cabal apart, along with anyone else responsible for covering it up.
So why don't they do it? Because this would be an obvious trigger to initiate the ELE-deterrent, as it's an existentialist threat (to the cabal).
So from this point of view, I can understand and sympathise (to an extent) with the intelligence agencies and all their cognitive infiltration programme because it's vitally important to prevent the triggering of the ELE-deterrent.
I may not be happy with them, for obvious psychological reasons, but I can understand them and, at least to a limited extent, approve.
Given they will certainly have someone reading every word I say, I hope they can take very good note of that comment.
I'll reply here for both of your replies to ImpObs.
When you say (I'm paraphrasing here) that unless every world government, intelligence agencies, etc., are members of cabal... - I think you're excluding this option as reality for the sake of the argument. Considering the fact that they've deliberately installed or invented nations, borders and replaced kingdoms with States - then, in my opinion, it was done with an agenda to remove themselves as those directly exposed to the reaction of the people for their misdeeds. In past times, when some event or policy of the self-imposed rulers would trigger the people to revolt, they would go knocking down doors straight to the king's or Counts', etc., home. So they have cunningly "removed" themselves from the frontline by installing "democracy" and people's representatives as "parliament" and institutions as to prevent direct identification of those really responsible for misdeeds. In this perspective, it's very important to have exact and concrete information about the people - they need to know in advance what's cookin' among plebs. The fear of extinction guides them. Thus they invented intelligence services. These act not against any kind of espionage among the nations (which are their own invention pushed into reality), but against those individuals they deem dangerous for their hegemony. People in general are extremely naive and tend to let themselves being guided and ruled, which is nothing worrying per se. But some individuals can see through the fog and incite others to revolt, with an idea to remove the cabal for the better life in the aftermath and not for position of power. And this needs to be prevented, rooted out before it even starts unfolding, hence all their control instruments installed everywhere. In this perspective, it's absolutely necessary to have control of all anti-governmental movements and ideas. Even better, they invent and control all the opposition themselves and even brag about it between the lines (to those who still read any texts longer than 160 symbols). The method or instrument of control is known as controlled opposition. So as evident, the instruments of control are all these institutions - the state, the government, the parliament, intelligence services, alternative parties, imaginary dichotomies, et al.
On another note, and as to my personal experience after having observed the politics for cca 3 decades already- all these people's representative have done absolutely nothing for the better of the people, worldwide. Excluding some bread & circus, money spent on nothing worth mentioning, the real changes in society have never occurred by the way of parliament and their decisions or laws. Or any revolution or real resistance. All those we know about from his-story, were controlled and instigated by cabal themselves to impose societal changes that further remove the people from being able to endanger their hegemony. For instance, the consequence of French revolution (as shown to be controlled op event led by the cabal by Mathis), was the introduction of parliament as an apparatus of control of the people by giving them an alleged opportunity to choose their own representatives. One would naively think that this was going to change things for the better. But in reality, it is laughable from the perspective of the cabal. It is in fact, an ingenious plan how to deceive the people into believing that they have taken over the positions of power and took over the control of anything important. It's extremely naive to believe that, in the first place, the power on that level is being handed over by the means of voting poles. All those representatives are inherently cabal's own peons, meaning they are cunning the people by making them believe otherwise (aka democracy; the supposed rule of the people). If this was not true, we would have seen some positive attempts to remove the cabal by now. As to my knowledge, nothing like that happened anywhere until this very moment.
Secondly, when talking about their miniscule numbers - thin about the psychology of the prisoners vs guards: in all cases the prisoners outnumber their guards by thousands to one -> yet you almost never see any kind of resistance or revolt happening. The prisoners could, if they wanted to, wring their guards' necks in the first instant. But they never do. Some of the prisoners maybe chose to devise the plan to escape and possibly a few of them work together to do it in reality. While all the rest simply give in and capitulate in their heads. It's really mindboggling trying to understand this psychology, but that's the reality of it. Meaning, to achieve total control of the plebs, you don't have to control entire government or State, parliament, etc... As they obviously know and have mastered, you only need a few peons to achieve it. And how do you control your own peons so they wouldn't seize power for themselves? By compromising their integrity with bribery, sex and fear of getting exposed. As evident for itself if one pays even small amount of attention to their mainstream media mouthpieces. Anyway, in short words - the pack of wolves is always howling together - no one can enter their pack and refuse to howl; if you don't, you're not getting inside.
Your initial point is well made and it's something I was definitely going to try and address at some point (you're correct I was making the assumption for the purposes of the argument). It is vitally important to at least attempt to get an idea of numbers, that's to say the total population size of Immanis. Not all Immanis are cabal, however - they would certainly have alphas-to-epsilons, I'm sure.
I suspect that their population size is, in fact, somewhat linked with their social cognition number, which I would imagine is different from Sapiens, and most likely somewhat lower (hence their paranoia and fear). To find this out would be a crucial discovery. Unfortunately the chance of doing any proper neuroscientific studies on these creatures is extremely low. They've probably done it on themselves, for sure, but they wouldn't tell us about it (e.g. Nat Rothschild did a Masters in Addiction Studies - and curiously he doesn't have children - maybe he doesn't want to pass the infection on to the next generation - if so, that's a hugely serious and significant development, certainly in terms of self-awareness - remember he's the only male child of his late father).
I am however still of the opinion that the population size of Immanis (absolute, not just relative to Sapiens) is much lower than they would like us to believe. This is, I admit, more of an instinctive hunch than based on any significant evidence, but I'm sure if I thought about it enough with regards to a proper study of history then I could come up with a good estimate, and possibly some proof of my assumption that they're fewer than they make out.
Maybe that may become clear in a further part of this series.
Interestingly, it is perhaps related to your final paragraph about prisoners. What you say is not strictly true I don't think. Remember prisoners in a prison don't get the opportunity to fight back because they are locked in cells and even in a riot they can't get outside. In an open air prison, however, or a concentration camp, say, it's a different story. But this also presumes they know they have nothing left to lose, and are all in there for either life sentences or death sentences. In which case, absolutely you would see the fight or flight response. Present day Gaza is a good example - apparently Hamas have massively increased their numbers with all those men of fighting age who have realised they have nothing left to lose (where previously they didn't display a fight or flight response because they convinced themselves to still have hope).
So it does totally depend on the circumstances, and the beliefs of the prisoners. it's important for the guards/cabal to convince the prisoners that 'all is not lost' - otherwise they will face the ultimate revolution. That's the real trick about democracy and 'opposition parties' by the way (yes, of course they're controlled, I agree) - it does provide that deception that 'things may get better'.
That's the really dangerous game the cabal are really playing here. They can't achieve totalitarianism without destroying the illusion that 'things might get better'. Once that illusion isn't there anymore, unless they have evened the odds in terms of numbers, then the ultimate revolution will happen and they will be exterminated in toto.
There are also different reactions to trauma of course - not just the freeze reaction. Anyway, you made some good points in your comment for sure and all of it is definitely meriting of consideration for all this stuff. This is becoming a much bigger topic than I first thought it would be! We'll end up writing an entire book at this rate!
Sorry Evelyn, the BRICs 5D chess, white hat BS, is intellectual-lite nonsense, as evidenced by being the same line the controlled-oppersition Q-tard psy-op takes. Read the China-Russia UN document showing they're both all in on the UN Agenda 2030 plan. Both Jabbed up their populations with the death jabs (as did 99% of the rest of the world).
Re the Central Bank thing, look what happened to Libya, Gaddaffi was trying to introduce a gold backed currency for Africa to break the Kabals monopoly. First thing the "allies" did when they went in was to open a new central bank, even before they topped Gadaffi.
On a lower level, look what happened to Liz Truss in the UK, she had the unfortunate luck to be voted leader of the ruling Conservatives and become PM, when the Kabal preferred Sunak, democracy got in the way of the Kabal so the BOE stopped buying bonds and sent the markets into turmoil, at the same time using the Kabal media to blame it all on her mini budget. She lasted ~3 weeks after that little democratic myoclonic jerk.
I agree they're going to pull the WW3 pin tho, besides the depopulation bonus, I can't see any other way they'd get the cherry on top of their world contol cake, digital ID (for security, we're at war stupid) and CBDC because we need a global financial reset to pay for all the destruction, rebuild, and reparations (again).
I've heard that point of course about China and Russia jabbing their own people, but I've yet to hear anyone provide me with the proof that what was in their injections was the same as the so-called mRNA stuff. If I was them I'd make damn sure it wasn't the same shit. Either a placebo or a genuine vaccine against a potential American bioweapon (to be released under cover of Covid).
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't UN agenda2030 the same as the GR? In which case it's not important.
Your points about the banks were answered already, but it does further remind me to do an economics explainer article soon. Although in my error I should've added earlier that on top of taking back control over the central bank & money supply I would obviously fix the value of the currency by fixing the prices of all the various necessary resources/commodities. That way the so-called 'markets' become impotent, and we have an economy based entirely on the 'real economy'. The 'markets' remember do not exist, they are a combination of the parasite bankers plus a bunch of coke-snorting wide boys in the City. They have fuck all to do with the real economy, which is simply the exchange of real physical objects and services conducted by normal people every day. Example - does a cow produce more or less milk if the 'markets' change the value of the currency? No. Now extrapolate to every other necessity of existence.
Prices don't put themselves up, people put prices up. Thus, I would have eliminated inflation at the same time. If we're talking Britain here then obviously I would have already taken control over the City of London. Naturally, though, your point about Gaddafi is extremely pertinent. The reason he was not able to succeed however was because the bad guys had a bigger military force. Of course in order for me, in this hypothetical scenario in which I become dictatrix of Britannia, to do all this stuff I would need the support of the army and the intel services. Assuming I had that, then I would immediately establish my deterrent which is a very large group of sleeper agents with a long list of names of everyone in the cabal, and their entire families. But that's another story.
With regards to Liz Truss, I think the better explanation is that the entire episode was planned and scripted in advance. After all, they simply couldn't have a brown man in number 10 when their ER2 was laid to rest and Charlie boy was installed in Fuckingham Palace now, could they? It also coincided with the Nordstream attack, if I remember correctly. But certainly my above points about economics apply. You must always remember the difference between 'the markets' and the real economy. The cabal have no control over the real economy, ultimately. The problem is that normal people have been prevented from knowing and understanding that.
Likewise, the fact of a bunch of parasites fucking with our economy arbitrarily as a result of the Truss/Kwarteng proposed budget - remember this was before they'd even done anything - should've been a wake up call. Unfortunately, it wasn't.
Your observations about ww3 are spot on, though.
You prompted another thought/insight - for which I am grateful - thank you for your comments because it's good to be challenged.
My thought was that it's a logical fallacy to mistake the method with the affiliation. That's to say, just because the BRICS may appear to use similar methods to the American-led bloc, doesn't necessarily mean they are on the same side. It's a bit like two mafia groups fighting over the same territory, but employing all the same behaviours.
I'm also absolutely not suggesting that BRICS are 'good guys' simply because they're enemies of the obvious bad guys. Same as, say, WW2, in which the Allies were demonstrably not 'good guys' (although they tried to make people think they were), but just because Germany was resisting that cabal doesn't logically mean they were 'good'. Most of them were a bunch of nasty, patriarchal racists after all.
I used to go to wine bars in the City where 'the markets' drank
Perhaps 'rivals' might be a better word than 'resistance' then. I can go with that one.
Anyway - as if right on cue, or as if they really are paying very close attention to everything I'm writing (they'd be negligent if they didn't, after all), Off-G (who I am now designating 'The Devil's Guardian') have published yet another anti-BRICS/Russian hit piece. This one is by a new contributor hey hey! And he has a Substack. Calls himself '009'. These people are exceptionally blatant - it's the psychology of the big lie of course.
One thing I was going to add to my comment below is the 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' idea (I believe this '009' cutout has already done a hit piece against that very phrase - and thus the strategic logic of it).
My home country (Britannia) has endured vassal status for a very long time (since 1066), but vassal status of the American Empire most recently. In the event of WW3, the Empire would lose and thus all those vassal states would be liberated. Yes, they'd lie in ruins, and have to spend decades repairing, but they would be free. Some people might say another group of criminals would take charge - which is highly likely - but those criminals could not possibly be Russia or China, precisely because of the promotion of nasty, racist nationalism by the Empire and its vassals. Some 99% of the British population would instantly resist Russian or Chinese occupation because it would be so overt, so that occupation/new vassal status simply wouldn't hold.
And this, I say, is why the intel cutouts like TDG are pushing their narrative. Or at least one reason. The most important thing, after all, is what happens after the liberation. This is the entire point of my own agenda and the Liberal Socialism thing. It's about independence, along with an immunity from malevolent governance, let alone vassal status. Know your enemy. And ironically, I do it because I do, as it happens, love my country. If the Circus have a plan for benevolent liberation to oppose the inevitable Bolshevik-like coup piggybacking on the revolution then count me in.
Once we have discovered a cutout, we can then eliminate their narrative from the list of hypotheses. So that's a big step forward.
Just as well their algorithm has me blocked from commenting before I've even left a comment or minded to leave one. Their other option would be to let me comment and do a dogpile. That might be a fun provocation test for a while but it would soon get tedious. So I'll just continue studying them, from an espionage and counter-subversion perspective.
replying to all your replies in one: Spunik vaccine is a viral vector delivery system, rather than mRNA delivery, both get your cells to make cytotoxic spike protiens, so it's the same as J&J and AZ's bioweapon.
China/sinovac used a virus particle vax, i.e. they injected just the cytotoxic spike protiens directly.
The problem is that the spike protien, when either made by your own cells a la mRNA/Viral vetor, or directly injected a la Sinovac, which can pass the BBB, contain a prionergic peptide sequence, that can cause a cascade of misfolded protiens (Prions). There is no safe dose of Prions. Prion diseases take 5-10yrs to show symptoms, they are called different names relating to the area of the brain where the cascade starts, Alzheimer's, Parkinsons etc. etc.
To understand propagation effects in populations, look at CWD in deer in the US, it started in Montanna in the 80's (next to Rocky Mountain labs who were studying Prions) and is now in all US states deer populations. Prions can survive autoclaving, can survive in soil, be taken up by plants, and passed on to those eating said plants. The first symptoms will be a raise in impulse control disorders, a handy bioweapon for anyone wanting to see a rise in public dis-order, and/or depopulation, with plausible deniability for themselves.
So yeah, same bioweapon effect the west got, different delivery mechanism. You can learn more about this from Dr K McCairn in these videos:
https://t.wtyl.live/c/prion.research.investigation.project/videos?s=1
Markets are priced on supply and demand, not just coke snorting bankster market makers. You can't have fixed pricing at point of sale, it doesn't work, for the simple reason any comodity is not just priced on it's intrinsic value, it's priced including supply chain costs, including transport (i.e. it's cheaper at source than it is shipped to the other end of the world/country) and labout costs (one reason Chinese crap is cheaper than US crap).
It works the same way with comodity backed currency, eventually there's not enough comodity to back currency requirements (e.g. gold standard) when there's not enough currency to go around it's called a recession. Of course the current system of printing money out of thin air and charging interest on it is corrupt as fuck, and why the globalists now own pretty much the whole world, because they have a monopoly on the printing and surplus (interest) gathering.
If the system was owned by the people, with money issued and retracted on a supply and demand baisis, rather than printed by private banks bearing interest, we'd be a whole nother level of better.
You seem to have an extremely myopic view of basic economics.
I don't believe you can't post on Off-G at all, I've been on thier naughty step for at least a couple of years but my posts escape pending evey time eventually, I've heard the same experience from others who post counter to Off-G narratives.
I thought 009 made some good points in that Off-G post, shame you couldn't answer any of them with more than a dismissive armwave.
Can you point me to the bit where Evie describes BRICs as the resistance?
Thank you in advance
It helps if you read the actual post we're commenting on. I quoted part of the 8th paragraph, second sentence, 9th line, under [24-10-19]. Here's the whole, rather long, sentence.
"Aside from the suspicion that the two chief editors, Kit Knightly and Catte Black, have the same name, their ‘playing down of the cabal’s evil’ by focusing people’s attention on the pathetic ‘Great Reset’ (yeah, it is pathetic and I will have to dissect it as such in a later paper – simply to say that an evil cabal would never have their abusive pathology satisfied by having citizens who are ‘happy’ even if they own nothing – they want 1984, not Brave New World), and their ‘fake binary’ narrative (which could easily be construed as a disguised anti-BRICS propaganda (i.e. anti-the resistance); not to mention subliminally making people feel that resistance is futile, thus generating learned helplessness/the freeze response – that’s a typical shill article, by the way – try it – it’s almost as if they are reading what I’m saying in this series!), we also have tropes like promoting the transphobia cult along with a ‘bioweapons don’t really exist because Sars-Cov2 never existed because viruses don’t exist so why don’t you all just shut up and go back to sleep, eh? Nothing to see here."
Thank you for not complying with my request
It might help if you could brush up your reading comprehension skills even? Just a thought?
To try to claim that I didn't read the post is downright insulting frankly. The fact that you can't justify your claim by analysing the text tells me all I need to know about you.
I can quote the words for you, but I can't understand them for you.
It may help if you could brush up on your logic skills, just a thought.
Evie described the Off-G narative as anti-BRICs propaganda qualifiying that statement as equaling "Anti-the resistance" with her i.e. statement in brackets. Therefore if Off-G=anti-BRICs also = Anti-The Resistance, THEN> BRICS=The Resistance in Evie's statement.
The fact that you didn't understand this on reading the intial post, or with requoting the intial post, or with Evie's subsiquent reply attempting to defend this position, tells me all I need to know about you.
I could probably intervene at this point and maybe clarify what I meant, because I did use the word 'resistance' of course, and you're kind of both right. Obviously, if one thinks the multipolar world order is the enemy, then of course BRICS is the protagonist, not the resistance. If, however, we're talking about the American-led Empire as the protagonist then BRICS, even if it represents an equally undesirable if different version of a new world order, is certainly a 'resistance' to the Empire, even if it's also a 'bad guy'. So by calling them a 'resistance' I am not necessarily endorsing them. And I do not accept the idea that they really are 'all in it together', for the simple psychological reason that the controllers of the Empire would never accept anything less than total world domination, which is unipolarity, not multipolarity.
I certainly should've clarified it by saying resistance to what in particular. So that's my mistake.
There are certainly some obvious attributes of countries like Russia, China, India etc. which are very negative indeed, and I certainly wouldn't want to live in a system in which they imposed their 'values' on my own life or country. But I think this is where the idea of 'nationalism' comes in. Nationalism has been so heavily promoted that it would be somewhat impossible to impose a 'foreign' way of life on a particular country (e.g. Britain; France would be similar I guess - and certainly America), whether that is a supranational 'order' or a Russian or Chinese or whatever. That includes the UN.
Because the 'nationalist blocs' consider the imposition of, say, Agenda2030 or Great Reset as a threat, this has, unfortunately, turned their nationalism from simple pride in one's own cultural identity into a very nasty right-wing quasi-fascism, perceived by them as 'self defence'. One suspects, ironically, that this has been deliberate and intended.
This nationalism, though, should be equally directed against the American Empire, which is demonstrably attempting (and succeeding to a large extent, especially in Europe) to impose its own 'values' on its vassals.
I guess the 'resistance' is not a simple homogenous thing, but is itself varied and multipolar...
It's much simpler Evelyn.
It's multiple plantations who's overseers are fighting for resources between themselves (sending the slaves in to do the actual fighting).
While in reality, all the plantations are are owned by the same kabal, who gather the surplus from all sides.
All the labels and isms are just the sticks the kabal use to poke them all to prevent them seeing who the owners really are.
If they knew Evie like I know Evie, oh, oh, oh what a girl!
Some articles and a documentary on 9/11 you might enjoy, dear writer...
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
An email discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
9/11 and the Debunking Olympics.
It's been ongoing since 2005 and the truth seems to be lurking in the shadows.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-and-the-debunking-olympics
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11
Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU