So that brings me onto energy production. This is where our new physics comes into its own. Which, for those of you who are wondering what any of this has to do with ‘Exo-affairs’, is where it ties in to DEXOS. We’re essentially talking here about the charge field, which is, for layperson’s sake, photons and electrons released by all matter (including the planet herself – there is a constant stream from the sun, which then gets recycled through the planet). These charged particles can be captured, stored, directed, transmitted, transmuted into electricity (that’s energy and information to you and me) and so on. Ask a guy called Tesla. No, that’s nothing to with deodorant guy (Elon Musk). He may not have fully understood the physics (at least in the more advanced way we do – which was more a lack of experimental tools than understanding) but he certainly understood how to make practical use of it. Despite being almost solely responsible for the electricity without which the modern world wouldn’t exist, the Establishment like to call him a charlatan. That’s not surprising – it happened when he threatened to give humanity free energy, for one, and when all of it could only be explained by the charge field, the new physics – which, as I have implied, removes every possible mechanism of power and social control from the cabal. That’s what all this is really about, and that’s why Liberal Socialism actively pursues and promotes this kind of research and education, and never sees money as an objection.
Now, in your world, it doesn’t surprise me in the slightest that you only use Tesla coils and Van de Graaff generators for ‘entertainment’. Of course they don’t want you to make your own energy! Let alone store it all year round in your own apartment (that link is just one example of many electrostatic storage ideas (here’s another very long one – I don’t expect you to read beyond the abstract, just get the basic idea); why they don’t then arrange them in quasi-crystal lattices I don’t know (Atlantean ever-burning lamps, that kind of thing – I’ve got some in my house; my dad’s company makes them); maybe they’ll get around to understanding these things in a few years or so – depending on the funding, obviously). High voltage is, erm, energy, ok? You don’t, actually need your ‘renewables’, to generate smaller scale energy production. But we’ll come to that in due course.
Oh – by the way, did you enjoy the time travel bit just then? I’m writing this in January 2022, remember, and some of those articles won’t be appearing until 2024. Now do you believe me when I say how far ahead of you we are? Don’t think about it too hard, though, eh.
So, I shall reiterate that the reason the cabal deny you, and individual countries for that matter (especially in the global south), self-sufficiency is because with self-sufficiency comes an immunity to dependency and control and subjugation. So in our world, all those third-world countries are now also self-sufficient for their energy needs. Aside from anything else, for us business people that’s what we call an ‘emerging market’ (which further exposes the cabal’s lies about ‘economics’). I already have over a hundred million subscribers to my glorious streaming service in the global south, and it’s one of our fastest growing sectors. Because more people have more money so they spend more. On things that make them happy. Like Katrina’s cool movies.
Notice well also that for the global south, this lack of neocolonial, globalist exploitation, combined with national ownership of resources, burgeoning infrastructure, self-sufficiency for energy, not to mention an absence of war, means those people don’t want to leave their own countries, so we don’t have a horrendous refugee problem like you do. Or economic migrants for that matter. This means people like Nigel Farage can’t play the racist card, and combined with economic prosperity we don’t have the same problem with the far right that you do. So there.
So, our energy production, at least here in Britannia, is based on those two aspects of self-sufficiency – on the one paw, at the local and individual level, and on the other paw, national self-sufficiency (for the major infrastructure). Remember the latter is owned by the people, by law, not by the State (as is the money supply, the national bank, I mean). The Lizzies reclaimed all the land and the property that had been stolen from us since 1066 and then gave it back to the rightful owners – the people. So we have our olde England back now. As do the Welsh, the Cornish, the Scots, and the Irish (which, naturally, is reunified). And there is nothing the bad guys can do about it anymore.
First, small scale energy production, that’s to say for individual households, some businesses, and small communities. Electric batteries. Charge field. All you need to do is ‘attune’ your device correctly to attract the charged particles and you have a constant recharging inward flow. Obviously there’s a bit more to it than that but in case you hadn’t noticed I’m an actress, not a physicist, so don’t ask me. Well, I’m being a little disingenuous here, given I have engineers in the family. Battery storage, however, as you may understand, really is the key thing here for individual and local self-sufficiency. It also works for electric vehicles, obviously. Tesla demonstrated this 90 years ago, driving around in his electric car all day at 90mph without ever recharging it.
I am not surprised your cabal have focussed you on lithium. It’s the same principle for why they turned everything to oil – it’s about control over commodities and exploitation, as always. And, naturally, fermenting a few conflicts along the way as part of their divide & rule strategy. At the very least you could switch to sodium. Given how much of something called an ‘ocean’ you have on this planet there’s not exactly a shortage and acquiring it from seawater isn’t environmentally damaging. You’d get maybe 100-150 miles on a fully charged battery but most people would use electric vehicles for short trips anyway. Plus you simply improve the infrastructure like we did, putting charging points all over the place and providing households with a free energy allocation to easily cover the recharging. This is, in fact, how the Lizzies first did it. This also had the benefit of making Britannia the world-leader in electric vehicle technology (publicly owned, obviously). The British people get it all at cost price, whilst the exports greatly improve our balance of payments and pretty much more than pays for the entire enterprise itself. That’s something the Americans call a ‘no brainer’ – not that they’d do it themselves, of course – but since when did Americans ever get the concept of irony? It's made all our cities breathable again. Childhood asthma? What childhood asthma? 40,000 people dying prematurely each year because of your kind of pollution? Nope. Ah – did you know Tony Blair’s Labour Government covered up a report about diesel fumes killing 40,000 people a year? Well now you do. I believe by now that will have killed more British people than he achieved in your second genocidal war against Iraq.
Why is he not in prison, by the way?
Anyway, we also use classic renewables for individual self-sufficiency. Call it nostalgia if you wish, because it’s not as if we really need them. I’m talking solar panels and such like (not silly wind turbines) – I would imagine our panels are far more efficient than yours though – I’d have to check out that one; do you use honeycomb quasi-crystal lattices to trap, resonate and excite the photons? Your Internet doesn’t seem to think so. Do you make use of the charge field (more photons) coming out of the interior of the planet? Doesn’t look like it either, according to your Internet. Well, there you go. New Physics, see. Anyway, for us in Britannia, wherever possible each new build house is fitted with this kind of stuff as somewhat standard.
We then have the larger-scale energy production, which is obviously necessary for a high-tech infrastructure. Steel, for example, you simply can’t really do with renewables. Maglev is another one. And if you want to do space exploration without it, then you may as well go back to crawling in the gutter. Maglev, by the way, has become the main thoroughfare for high-speed travel. Domestically, most Maglev lines will go just below the speed of sound, around 550mph or thereabouts (it’s a step beyond your Maglevs, which only go around 350mph apparently – ours essentially fly due to lift from the charge field). In other words, the same speed as one of your commercial airliners. This likewise raises a further suspicious fact – that yours don’t go faster than around 300-350mph. I fully suspect that’s because they would start to lift off at that speed (because they pick up more of the charge field coming out of the planet – that’s how planes fly), and that simple fact would make people revise their entire opinions about physics. Which, of course, leads on to the charge field, which leads on to Tesla’s free energy, which leads to no more cabal social control, or war, or, well, you get the picture. They simply can’t allow you to have these things, you see. Anyhow, obviously we have to stop our Maglevs flying off into the atmosphere so we put them in magnetised tubes. So it’s not so much magnetic lift, as magnetic levitation from all sides.
We have a faster one, which, ironically given my story, starts off in Western Europe at the aforementioned Gare de l’Est, and gets up to about Mach 2 by the time it reaches Berlin. From there, since 2017, you can go all the way to Beijing or Vladivostok if you fancy. That is a seriously cool trip, and I’ve done both myself. Just don’t look out the window, unless you’re prepared for a serious headache.
One of the great things about Maglev is that it’s made those awful budget airlines a thing of the past. I’m not surprised you still have them. I do, however, wonder why you put up with being treated like cattle. In my world, air travel is kind of like an affordable luxury, and flying is a real pleasure. You get loads of legroom, drinks are free, the food actually tastes nice, there’s a smoking bit at the rear of the aircraft (you’re picturing me as a glamourous air hostess now aren’t you? dream on, darling, dream on), and you have all the trimmings you should have and used to have back in the old days when I was a child and flying was such a beautiful thing. In your world, I intend to do everything I can to avoid it.
Likewise we don’t have a terrorist problem, so you don’t have to go through all that ridiculous and annoying ‘security measures’ at airports.
In Britannia, predictably another taking-back-into-public-ownership thing the Lizzies did was British Airways, which should be – and now is, in my world – a great source of national pride. British citizens get substantially reduced ticket prices. We also have a fleet of Concorde 2.0s. 2.0 was originally intended as a new flagship fleet for BA, but then some crafty Conservative Party MP pointed out that ‘public ownership of luxuries makes one suspect hidden Marxist tendencies in the Party opposite, Madame Speaker.’ That was a fair point, conceded by the Government, who promptly put the fleet up for sale. So yours truly and my good friend (and, ahem, ex-boyfriend) Nathaniel Morgan got together with a certain Mr. Richard Branson and bought all twelve of them (we thought 4.8 billion was a bargain – even if it did take us ten years to break even). This was largely a totally Indian purchase on my part because I’m just completely in love with that airplane. Unlike Concorde 1.0 we don’t just do Paris and New York. We’ll go anywhere. If you’ve got the money (although our ticket prices are really quite reasonable, I would say). And at Mach 3.5 we can outrun the intercontinental Maglev, so there. Plus, somewhat obviously, Maglev can’t get you across the Atlantic. And their champagne isn’t free.
Anyhow, for the national-level infrastructure the Lizzies embarked initially on a combination of nuclear fission and coal. The coal, ironically, is not in fact necessary whilst we have fission (and now all the newfangled cool free energy stuff), but there is a neat little story behind it, which, if you hate Thatcher, you will adore.
Shall I tell you about it now? Yeah, why not. Ok. Well, part of the Lizzy manifesto was about reversing the old Enclosures Acts, which was the Establishment’s method of essentially stealing the people’s land (initiated in 1066 then continued five hundred years later by that tyrant Henry VIII when he dissolved the monasteries, and what was effectively the medieval welfare state along with it – Thatcher would’ve approved). So the Lizzies took it back and handed it over initially to local councils, although there were certain conditions attached (like building new houses and establishing organic farms and such like). Buried in the small print, however, was a lovely and cunning little clause that went something like ‘if there are existing or discovered resources in these areas, then commercial exploitation of such resources will be the exclusive property of local residents’. As you may be aware, when Thatcher ruthlessly destroyed all those communities by shutting down the mines that left a good 300 years’ worth of coal in them thar hills. And it didn’t even reduce our coal consumption that much either. Instead, we had to import it from Germany at a higher cost! Which goes to show it was nothing to do with environmentalism. Up to that point, remember, we had also been more than self-sufficient for our entire energy requirements. Anyway, the funny thing is it took people in these old coal-mining communities about a month after the bill was passed to actually notice this bit in the small print.
It was like, “’Ere, tek a look at this.”
“Wha’s that?”
“Sez ‘ere if there’s resources round these parts then we get exclusive ernership of ‘em.”
“Uh?”
“Kerl, yer pillock, kerl. There’s 300 ‘undred years’ wort’ o’ kerl in them thar ‘ills. An’ it sez ‘ere it now b’longs to us. Fer exclusive purposes o’ commercial exploitairtion.”
“You sure?”
“Aye.”
“So does that mean we can reopen pit?”
“Aye. Mind you, we should prob’ly check it with t’councilman, eh?”
“An’ a lawyer too?”
“Aye. But not before you’ve bought us anuther ale.”
Suffice to say, they did check it with t’councilman, who, naturally, was more than happy to associate his ugly mug with the project. Likewise, the funding was gleefully provided by their local branch of the national bank which, naturally, also happened to be controlled by the council.
And of course, the real icing on the cake was that by this time Thatcher had already been incarcerated in Broadmoor, the bitch. So once word got out, other mining areas followed. And of course she was informed about this happy turn of events. The apocryphal story is that the lady did, indeed, turn her head away upon hearing the news.
I should also note that in many respects we’ve definitely gone a bit steampunk. Along with our publicly-owned rail network (the regular trains are free at the point of use), they re-opened most of the old branch lines that Beeching got rid of (he had financial interests in the automotive sector, don’t you know – plus he was a fucking Tory), and more than that, we have revived our beautiful Victorian tradition of steam trains. Tourists (and children) love them. As do I. You might not be surprised to understand that a lot more British people do go on holiday in their own country now, and it is partly because of this. Likewise, we have a lot more public holidays than you do so a nice steam engine ride for a trip to the coast if the weather’s lovely and there’s haddock and chips waiting is, well, I don’t even need to big up the delights of that, eh?
Perhaps you think it’s dirty and dangerous and all the rest of it, this coal mining, father? Not anymore it isn’t. It’s an extremely high-tech operation and they have robots. Most miners call them droids because some of them do have something of the R2D2 look about them (many suspect they were designed precisely for that). Some miners even decided to fit a voice synthesiser so every time they start a new subroutine sequence they emit a distinctly R2-esque series of beeps and whistles.
I for one, totally approve.
And some of you darling readers are probably thinking this isn’t particularly environmentally friendly? Well, you’d be dead wrong. It’s extremely environmentally friendly. See, these much higher-tech versions of coal-powered plants belch out beautiful, pure CO2, which, being a heavier molecule than the rest of the atmosphere, has a tendency to sink down into the surrounding countryside. Which countryside is now a picturesque tapestry of lovely organic farms. Given that most of those crops evolved at a time when CO2 levels were much higher, they are no longer so starved of food. So when we achieve local CO2 levels somewhere between 5-600ppm, we have a correspondingly greater crop yield. Meaning that some of our organic farms can achieve up to 15-20kg per square metre (a usual average would be around 10 per square metre). Plus, naturally, it makes those regions completely self-sufficient for energy.
This is an article I forgot to link to last episode. It will give you a good idea of our system. Anything by Colin Todhunter is worth reading.
Hmm. If I start ranting on about your silly global warmism stuff you might get upset with me, mightn’t you? Well, I’ll just say we don’t have climate alarmism. We understand climate science somewhat better than that. On the one paw I’m surprised that this is yet another area of junk science bunkum people still believe in, but on the other paw, given the sheer number of bunkum stuff people still believe in one might see it is simply one more on the list. In our world firstly it was the ice core data that started dismantling the CO2-induced warming hypothesis (CO2 fluctuations follow temperature, not the other way round, by around 800 years – did you hear about the Medieval Warming Period, by the way? That was 800 years ago, so I’d be worried if you didn’t have rising CO2). Then what really killed it off was the UEA climate department scandal, revealing how they’d been falsifying all the data and rigging the peer review process. Quite frankly, I wouldn’t trust any of the data you are receiving anymore. For a start you can’t talk about ‘averages’ in such a complex constellation of microclimates, whether that’s temperature or CO2. As I said, CO2 is a heavier molecule than the rest of the atmosphere, so it sinks to the surface, where it gets recycled by plants into oxygen. Do they not teach you photosynthesis in school these days?
Well, perhaps not.
And here’s another thing you may have noticed – they don’t include the environmental impact of the military, do they? Especially the American military. So that raises the first intriguing question which is how can their ‘climate models’ be correct if they leave out all that data? Then there’s all those toxic chemicals released by the military. Then there’s all those wars about oil and ‘critical minerals’ (and your lithium), the mining for which also causes massive environmental damage. Then, of course, there’s weather warfare. Environmental modification. Maybe that’s what’s causing your so-called ‘climate change’ and ‘extreme weather events’ and ‘natural disasters’ – because it sure as hell isn’t CO2. Nor is it the sun.
So I’m not surprised all those so-called ‘climate scientists’ working for those same governments and NGOs don’t talk about any of that. Look the other way, people, and don’t ask pertinent questions. Others, however, are not so compliant.
See, I really should justify myself here, because otherwise you really will get upset with me and maybe even unsubscribe, and that would be a pity. You would be forgiven for thinking that my proselytising has engendered a whole load of animosity amongst my new friends here in Cambridge. Well, actually, I was pleasantly surprised to discover that was not the case. The reason is, in fact, the Covid jabs. Thing is, everyone at my two sports clubs knows people who have been harmed by these injections. And not-so-secretly none of them will ever be taking these things again. They will also be extremely reticent about childhood vaccinations to the extent they will, at the bare minimum, do their own research.
So, they listened to what I had to say. And especially the insight that the people in power who scared people with Covid and then forced these injections on them did so knowingly. And once you have seen what such people are like, you then start to question all the other things they say and do. Simple question – what else are they attempting to traumatise people about? In order to control their behavioural reaction? Yeah, that’s it – ‘climate emergency’. Whilst, of course, not acting as if it’s real in any perceivable way. Why? Because those people know there is no ‘climate emergency’. So, when I told them about all the actual science, they listened. They did not immediately turn away and dismiss me as some kind of dangerous nutcase. And what really amazed them was that these scientific facts were pieces of information they had never encountered before. Information denied them. The truth doesn’t fear questioning, you see. In which case, why censor? They hadn’t been given this information because they had been incessantly told that anyone who proffers these pieces of information must be either in hock to the ‘fossil fuel lobby’ or, again, a ‘conspiracy theorist’. They have been told all this stuff has been ‘debunked’ by ‘scientists’. They are incessantly told there is a ‘consensus’, and that ‘the science is settled’. It has been rammed into them, quite frankly, and always associated with ‘fear’, and that’s what is otherwise known as child abuse.
So, look out of your window and tell me if you ever see any signs of ‘climate change’. No, you don’t. Apparently it’s always ‘over there’, isn’t it? But how do you know? Because some propagandist on the BBC says so? Otherwise it’s always ‘ten years away’. Ten years later, it’s another ten years. Then another. And so on. They try and scare you with utterly unscientific absurdities about certain levels of temperature rises leading to this, that and the other disaster. Well, as a medieval historian I’m not aware of any disastrous effect on the climate in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, when northern hemisphere temperatures increased around two degrees. In fact, it was a brilliant thing, because it led to a burgeoning merchant class, the guild movement, and that class exerting their influence to force the aristocracy to create something called a ‘parliament’ along the lines of the old Anglo-Saxon moots. In other words, they initiated what they hoped would be a slow revolution to undermine and overthrow the Norman occupying forces. Unfortunately that didn’t pan out too well in the end, but these popular anti-Establishment movements did lead to progress. The universities, the renaissance. Ironically, to science.
Of course the powers-that-shouldn’t-be hate science. Or rather, they hate popular understanding of science. Or popular understanding of anything, for that matter. An educated population cannot be controlled, essentially. So, they lie. That’s all you need to know. They lie.
And now my new friends understand this. Because they have been on the receiving end. And that can’t be undone.
Once you understand the way the world really functions, and what these monsters are really like, you have crossed a line and you can never believe a word they ever say again. You see through all their machinations. Except you may also feel helpless, and in danger. And so, when faced with that, most people are inclined to step back to the other side of that barrier and take the path of least resistance. They take the blue pill. Because it’s safer there, they think. But that is only self-deception. Because it’s not safer.
Perhaps people have an instinctive knowledge, or foreknowledge, about that. And so they choose not to listen to dissidents. Or dissidence. Instead they turn away. Because it’s not psychologically tolerable to take the red pill.
And so the bad guys win.
But not in my own world’s history. Because we understood these psychological principles. And this history. And then we acted on it. This is why we don’t have a climate emergency.
Still, rather than ramble on about that I will just say two things. First, when we took over the old Green Party in 1991 we totally rejected the global warming thing, knowing it was a manufactured diversion from the real and genuine environmental issues I had grown up with (deforestation, for example). We also knew it wasn’t based in any real science and it had a clear political (or geopolitical) agenda behind it. Not trusting a damn thing the cabal says should be the default. They don’t care about you or the planet, and that’s all you need to know.
Second, to somewhat change the subject into something far more fascinating for all you science fiction fans, this new physics, which readily explains the atmosphere (Miles Mathis has written an excellent explainer on this here; this one goes a bit further), has significant implications for exo-planet hunting and exobiology, and therefore the so-called Drake Equation, which I will be talking about in the next part of this DEXOS thing (you can have a Butcher’s at this if you want to get a head start – but remember it’s Willypedia, and you’re a Womble). Put simply, one of the main reasons our atmosphere is 99% nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, is because those three elements are in effective equilibrium between gravity (pulling down to the surface) and the planetary charge field (pushing them up). CO2 is about 10% too heavy. Guess what about Venus? It has 10% less gravity than we do. CO2 on Venus, then, is in that equilibrium. Now apply that reasoning to other planets (both in this system and in other systems), and you will have to revise the standard view about exobiology, as well as their atmospheric compositions. Like I said, we have discovered life on some of those moons. Similar reasoning applies to planetary system formation, by the way. The existence of the solar charge field, and the same from the larger planets in particular, has equally significant implications for planet hunting, and leads me firmly to believe they are lying to you about some of these other star systems.
But that’s for another time.
I am digressing. As usual.
So, one of our other major sources of energy, as I say, is nuclear fission. One of the great by-products of splitting uranium, by the way, is caesium, which just happens to be the most electropositive element. Electropositive meaning the release of electrons. Electrons, as I’m sure you are also aware, are extremely useful little things.
Especially for propulsion. So listen up, sci-fi fans, because we call this ‘electrogravitics’. Technically that’s something of a misnomer, and was popularised by Asimov of course, but the name sort of stuck so we keep using it. A more scientifically accurate term would perhaps be something like ‘electro-anti-charge field-itics’ or something. Some of the first experiments in this, carried out in Germany towards the end of the war (what are called ‘foo fighters’), used spinning mercury (Xerum 525 – I’m not surprised Willypedia says ‘conspiracy theory’ – well it would, wouldn’t it), which sort of ionised the surrounding charge field and pushed against it, thus generating thrust or propulsion. In this sense, it only looks like it's ‘anti-gravity’. It’s not anti-gravity in the sense of using the same force. It’s more like a sort of simulation of anti-gravity. Bear in mind by the way I’m giving you layperson’s language here, so don’t get pedantic with me. Later experiments switched from mercury to caesium, because of the far higher electropositivity. The original foo fighters proved somewhat impossible to control, and would’ve been fatal to any pilot they tried putting inside, and gyroscopes didn’t help either. The solution comes from having multiple spinning caesium engines. In fact, the more the better. So they started with three, in a triangular formation, then four, five and so on, until they realised you may as well just put them in a ring.
So there’s your flying saucers, UFO fans. Not extraterrestrial in the slightest. Just some really cool physics.
And what’s even cooler is that this kind of stuff makes interstellar travel eminently possible.
So we don’t really do our space launches with vertical rockets anymore. We essentially have horizontal take-off rocket-plus-caesium-powered spaceplane type things. This is much cheaper, safer, and greatly widens the possible locations for spaceports. I noticed you might be having one in Cornwall. We do too, although I would imagine it’s somewhat cooler than your version. And more profitable. And exclusively owned by the people of Cornwall, for that matter.
Should I say ‘to be continued…’ to entice you sufficiently to ensure you come back for the next thrilling instalment? Yeah, I think so. Because this ‘Welcome to DEXOS’ ramble is turning out to be a lot longer than I had originally envisaged…