The Lizzy PR-2 Voting System - Part 2
Katrina's Patent Political Predictions
Click here for part one…
Recap…
Whilst we’re on the subject of Farage, I reckon I can afford a little prediction for your own next election. The trick for working it out is to understand that the Establishment effectively decides what election result it wants well in advance. It then closely watches the genuine polls (not the official ones, which simply reflect the result desired by the Establishment, and are intended to influence you), in some areas quite specifically, and then, if the ‘natural’ (i.e. not rigged) result matches what they want then they don’t need to rig it. If it doesn’t, then they have a sufficient period of time to organise their vote-rigging operation. Thus, you have to be of the ‘conspiracy theory’ persuasion to understand all of this. You simply work out, psychologically as much as anything else, what the Establishment want, then you translate that into percentage vote shares and seats. For your next election, for example, I would imagine they want a repeat of your 1997 election.
Hmm. This is already getting quite a long burble, isn’t it? Ok, then, I’ll have to entice you into coming back for more with yet another patent to be continued…
Part 2
So then, let’s have some predictive fun, meaning here before I tell you about our own electoral history in more detail (partly so you can understand what you’re missing), here is Katrina’s patent political prediction for your next two years or so of politics, ending with your 2024 election. As always, absent some catalysing event, naturally.
As I say, they will probably want a repeat of your 1997 result, which was your ‘New Labour’ landslide. The Establishment know perfectly well that it is always only a matter of time before the people start hating the Tory government and chanting their ‘get the Tories out’ slogans. Thus, it behooves the Establishment to create and maintain a ‘controlled opposition’ who can provide an illusion of change when the people clamour for it, as they will always do if you keep voting for monsters. In your world, this controlled opposition is your Labour Party. You have to understand, here, that Keir Starmer is the Establishment’s man (and always has been – he’s been a fully paid-up member, after all – as proven by his association with the Trilateral Commission) and as far as the cabal are concerned he is a safe pair of hands and will proceed with whatever agenda the cabal have in mind. He proved that already by purging the party of all those pesky pseudo-socialists, and by fully supporting the government with their Covid thing.
On that note, I hear talk of ending the pandemic later this month, meaning that programme has run its course and presumably been eminently successful, and the cabal are eager to get on with their next big thing. Given all the manufactured diplomatic tensions with Russia (plus the fact they’ve primed the public with incessant anti-Russian propaganda) the smart money is on a spring offensive into the Donbass launched by the NATO-backed neo-Nazi regime in Kiev. This will force Russia to come to the defence of those culturally Russian eastern Ukrainians, which will, naturally, be portrayed by your mainstream media as an ‘unprovoked invasion’ (just as with Afghanistan in 1979), leading to a whole load of sanctions to begin with which will provide further excuse to drive up inflation (especially for energy) which further entrenches social control and economic recession. This kind of poverty, of course, is what aids the far-right. Add a ‘foreign threat’ to that and you have a perfect recipe for fascism. The cabal, remember, are essentially fascists, and they would not be satisfied with a Brave New World. They want 1984, in all its cruelty and torment.
Keir Starmer, the Establishment’s tool, will go along with all of this. Expect an increase in nationalist propaganda over the next few years. So, in order to get Starmer into government and provide the illusion of change, despite the fact that this will not be the ‘change’ people really want (they want liberal socialism, believe me), they will need to provide a believable narrative to explain the Labour landslide in 2024. Thus, enter another Establishment man, Nigel Farage. He, clearly, is a key player in all this. Notice how he masquerades as ‘anti-Establishment’ – this is the opposite of the truth. If he really was anti-Establishment the Establishment’s mainstream media would deny him a platform, or only allow him to speak rarely in order to demolish him in the eyes of the public (I believe they did that to his effective predecessor, Nick Griffin, leader of the British National Party). The clue is in the airtime, you see. Farage is permitted a disproportionate amount of media publicity, and usually with either no challenge, or only half-hearted, lip-service challenge (usually by other Establishment tools, all of whom will have received the appropriate script).
Now, given that they can’t persuade people to vote for Starmer, they have to collapse the Tories. Farage is a good way of splitting that vote, of course, whilst also pushing the ‘narrative’ further right. It provides an excuse for the likes of Starmer to adopt further right-wing policies with the excuse of ‘preventing Farage’. Fall for that, and you’ll fall for anything. The British electorate don’t seem to be as stupid as the cabal would like, however, if the polls are anything to go by. I would say this is the ‘Boris’ effect. If they want to collapse the Tory vote share then Boris has to go (hence this ‘parties at number ten’ scandal, which is a bit less important than mass murder by not closing the borders, don’t you think? – it’s a distraction technique) and replaced by someone without the same (perceived) ‘charisma’ and (yes, false) charm (don’t be fooled by that, of course – Boris is a narcissistic sociopath – perhaps even a psychopath, given how he seemed happy to allow some ‘deadly disease’ to enter the country, projected to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent British people – supported by Starmer, don’t forget). Better still, choose someone half the Tories wouldn’t vote for – I’d go for this bloke Sunak. Mainly because he’s a ‘brown man’, and half the Tories are racists, so would not be happy with a brown man as Prime Minister. It’s not pleasant to have to say that, of course, but that’s what you have allowed your country to come to.
So, along with the change of government, what they will really be concerned about is making people think that Starmer (and his right-wing policies) are more popular than Jeremy Corbyn’s genteel and remarkably half-hearted, soft attempt at socialism. It didn’t go anywhere near far enough (it can’t without public ownership of the money supply), but it was at least a step in the right direction which would’ve made people more accepting when liberal socialism was offered them (it wouldn’t appear so radical – remember, you’ve had ‘radical’ since 1979). Anyway, they really need to give Starmer more votes than Corbyn got in both 2019 (10.3 million, according to your Willypedia) and 2017 (12.9 million). Well, there is no way they can do that without a serious amount of vote rigging, and I’m sure they are already busy planning that. I’d say they’d need to give Starmer around 3 million or so, given under natural circumstances he’s not going to get much more than 10 million if that. People do know he lied to his own party members to get elected, you know, and that he is the Establishment’s man, and he cannot be trusted. The Establishment will need to bear that in mind. They know perfectly well they can create 3 million votes after all, seeing as they probably did that in 2019 for Boris (whilst removing 3 from Jeremy most likely – but I digress).
They will also want to give Farage a good amount of seats, with, say 15-20% of the vote. Let’s say 10-20 seats, which will make a serious impact. That way he can continue to push the fascist agenda. Similarly, they will want to give your Green Party a few more seats so they can maintain the global warmist agenda. That agenda is about socioeconomic- and behaviour-control, of course (also call it eco-fascism). Coupled with destroying economic productivity (as you’ve seen in Germany – who will certainly be seriously adversely affected by a war in Ukraine, by the way), which leads to poverty, recession, inflation and unrest, further driving people into the arms of the fascists. Your Green Party continued down a different path to ours, as I have said, given myself and the Lindauers were not there to take over the party from the likes of Porritt and the Green 2000 movement back in 1991. Those are the people who effectively drove the party into ‘centrism’ and fully adopted the global warmist agenda to the exclusion of all the genuine environmental issues we were campaigning about back in the eighties.
Our new, 1991, liberal socialist Green Party were perfectly well-aware of the scam that was the global warming agenda (invented as it was twenty years’ earlier by the Club of Rome and all that), and so never bought into it at all. Instead, we stuck to our own narrative and were ultimately proven correct, not just by the science, but finally with the University of East Anglia Climate Department scandal in the 2000s, where they were caught fabricating data and suppressing the truth [Hey, Guy! Given I’ll be in Norwich tomorrow, how about some spying at the University? Absolutely not, Katrina. Oh, come on! It'll be fun! You know you want to. You can’t hide that smile from me, Guy. Stop it, Katrina. Nope, not going to. Not until you say yes! …]. Anyway, I digress. The global warming thing is important to the cabal, though – they have something of a sunk cost fallacy in it, and simply can’t abandon it just yet (once they have fascist governments, associated with what you call ‘climate scepticism’, then they’ll be able to ditch it – you’ll be too concerned about being subjugated by fascists to notice there’s no global warming by then). Hence, they need to ensure their controlled Green Party is a part of that.
Thus, 3-6 seats would do it, I reckon.
Liberal Democrats? Hmm. Well, I think they will want to allow them some kind of political comeback because they well understand the value of an ‘official’ ‘centrist’ party as a contingency in the case of a hung parliament (you’ll have an increasing clamour for PR, after all – which is partly why I present you with our version). In such a contingency, they ensure the Establishment continues by either propping up a right-wing government (the Tories, in your case – as you saw in 2010-2015), or preventing any semblance of ‘socialism’ if the controlled opposition don’t get a majority (Labour, again in your case). So let’s give the Liberal Democrats 50 seats and 10-12%. Given that those 50 seats will be at least 4-5 times what Farage gets, despite Farage winning more votes, the case for PR will be strengthened.
The version of PR you will be offered, however, will absolutely not be our one. Instead, it will be specifically designed to ensure continued governance by the Establishment. They will absolutely have a ‘minimum vote threshold’ designed solely to prevent any uppity minor parties from getting anywhere. Once their PR happens, they can then very easily manufacture a result which hands the balance of power to the fascists. Notice that if Farage gets 15% in a PR system then that’s 100 seats or so. Give the Tories 240-250 seats and there you have it – British fascism arrives.
So then – Katrina’s patent political prediction looks something like this: Labour 400-420 seats (probably around 40%, +/- 3%). Tories 130-150 seats (25% +/-3%). Farage 10-20 seats (15-20% (actually we’ll drop the lower level to 5 seats, rather than 10, so as to further strengthen the case for PR, so that’s 5-20 seats)). Lib Dems 40-60 seats (10-13% - again, the higher the discrepancy vs. Farage the better). Similarly with the Green vote for PR: let’s give them 3-6 seats on 5% of the vote. Under PR, that would be 30-40 seats. Likewise, Labour will have that stonking majority on significantly less than 50% of the vote.
You should also remember that these five parties are all controlled by the Establishment. They are only there to provide you with the illusion of choice, democracy, and representation. And to further the agenda, of course. But you are not represented. You are governed. Or perhaps ‘subjugated’ might be a better word. And you have been such since 1066. Remember, the identity of this small minority group is not a ‘racial’ thing. They may have started out as Normans, but the genetics have morphed a little over the years, and there are far too many Ivanhoes in this country now. In our world, we took our country back in 2003, after 937 years.
As for the other parties, they will probably want to eliminate the idea of Scottish nationalism (or Irish reunification) for at least a generation, so expect the SNP to lose a few dozen seats. Let’s give them 20-30, so long as Labour have a majority in Scotland. Starmer, being a good little knight of the realm, will be fully in favour of unionism, regardless of Celtic national pride, which deserves independence (I would say that, of course, being mostly Celtic – it won’t be long in our world before Wales and Cornwall are independent – in Cymru it’s around 46-48%, and Kernow it’s around 40-45%).
In terms of numbers of votes, like I say, the clue is that they need to make Starmer appear more popular than ‘socialism’ (i.e. Jeremy Corbyn’s 2017 result), so he can trumpet on about how his ‘changed’ Labour Party is vindicated and the people firmly rejected the Corbyn manifesto. So let’s say a turnout of 35 million (about two-thirds I believe that is), meaning Starmer’s 13-14 million is what, 40-odd percent. Now take around 12-13 million and split them between Tories and Farage, say on a 2:1 ratio – Tories 8-9 million, Farage 4-4.5. Or better still Tories 7-7.5 and Farage 5 or so (which is around 15%). They really want fascism and PR remember. So Lib Dems 3.5-4 million. Greens, what’s 5%? 1.75 million. Hmm, let’s get them above the 2 million mark for psychological reasons (having a ‘2’ at the beginning makes a serious instinctive difference, if you know your psychology).
It will be all about psychology, remember. That’s what the result will really be intended to do. PR and fascism.
But certainly, when we get that result, they will effectively provide us with a lot more information about what their gameplan is. In my experience, however, they are really very predictable, so I reckon I’m right.
Furthermore, judging by your ‘European Union’, it seems clear they intend for the whole of Europe to follow suit. Of course it’s already fascist, but it won’t become outright and overt fascism until it’s too late for you to change it. A pseudo-war with Russia should do the trick, along with some other conflicts in Africa and the Middle East (stoked up by the likes of the CIA, as usual; and MI6 for that matter [Erm, Katrina? What did I tell you? Cover story, Guy. Cover story.]) to generate a flood of refugees, and you have a perfect recipe for fascism. And don’t be misdirected by this ‘Great Reset’ rubbish – you will not get the Brave New World dystopia, where you will own nothing and be happy. You will get 1984. I’ve noticed already a lot of these ‘conspiracy theorists’ have been seduced by this World Economic Forum stuff, and this ‘culture war’ rubbish. And it’s turned them into fascists themselves. It’s not pretty.
And, as I say, absent some catalysing event, like yours truly being persuaded to get involved in your stupid politics and forming a proper Lizzy party and knocking our common sense manifesto into your heads (like public ownership of the money supply, which enables every other policy in the manifesto and is the policy the cabal fear the most, because it utterly neutralises their power), then actually being allowed to tell the people all about it – which, let’s face it, ain’t gonna happen – I’m sorry to have to tell you, dearest people of Britannia, that you don’t have the political intelligence to vote for anything else, for your best interests (and the interests, more importantly, of your own children). The fact that you have not formed a liberal socialist party, with its blatantly obvious policies, united around it, bypassed the mainstream media with a massive direct-to-the-people campaign, shows that maybe you don’t actually deserve it, in the end. If you did, you’d have it by now. Because normal people are liberal and they are socialist. They want security on the one paw (socialism) and the opportunity to fulfil their aspirations on the other paw (liberal). There has always been a massive open goal in the political compass for liberal socialism. In our world, we took that shot and won. You didn’t.
It shouldn’t be up to me to do this for you. Besides, if I’m the only one, then ‘eliminating’ me is the obvious, logical option for the cabal. And I am not here to be whacked at the earliest opportunity. That would be counter-productive.
Anyway, we shall see what happens in a few years’ time. Perhaps we can revisit what I’ve said here and compare it to the official result.
In the meantime, I think I shall leave the details of our own election results history for the next part.
Here it comes, darling readers. To be continued…